At 09:04 PM 8/17/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote:
One is enough. Less is more. Let's eliminate redundancy, thus eliminating
redundancy.
LMAO RAH :-)
=
36 Laurelwood Dr
Irvine CA 92620-1299
VOX:
At 03:55 PM 11/7/02 +0100, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Regardless of whether one uses volatile or a pragma, the basic point
remains: cryptographic application writers have to be aware of what a
clever compiler can do, so that they know to take countermeasures.
Wouldn't a crypto coder be using
