(apologies if this has been discussed already)
The darkest side of ID theft - When impostors are arrested, victims get
criminal records...
Malcolm Byrd was home with his two children on a Saturday night when a knock
came at the door. Three Rock County, Wis., sheriffs officers were there with
You seem to be such a hopeless case that I don't even know where to start.
Your vulgarity alone gives paints a pretty good picture of you. If you
prefer to carry on like an immature grade-school kid, I'll be ignoring you.
Let me know when you want to have an actual conversation with viable content
- Original Message -
From: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
False positives: What about folks with vinegar on their breath?
I think that being pulled over once a
- Original Message -
From: Dan Veeneman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
I had an acquaintance years ago that always kept a bottle of cologne
in the car. If he was ever pulled over
of the unit. Unless it cryptographically allows the car to operate only
when functional, someone will figure out how to defeat it.
Subscribe
to The Gann Letter if you are interested in:varying levels of
humor/jokes/quotes, parody/satire,science/space/technology items, cool news,
games,programs, pics
Good job. You just caused law enforcement to ignore emitters from all cabs,
government, and police vehicles.
My guess is that the unit will perform a self-check and emit a broken signal
instead of drunk. Maybe the police will only pull over broken vehicles not
listed above, knowing that broken
Actually, read the article. It covers sober driver and drunk passengers.
Quoting Bill Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 10:52 PM -0800 3/6/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver and
calls
the police has been developed by a team of
I don't guess you read the article. It answers at least your first question.
Another option to breathing through a tube might be to not drink alcohol before
driving. Wow, you know... deterring people from drinking and driving might be a
favorable side effect of this public-monitoring,
I would fairly entertain said discussion.
Erle
http://ganns.com
Quoting Pete Capelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes. Won't someone please think about the *children*? We shouldn't
have a problem with being monitored 24x7 if we aren't doing anything
illegal, right? Especially since it's for
Wow, easy there, chief. I think you have some aggression you may want to let a
professional address. Besides that...
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there are trade-
offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring the innocent to, in
turn, attempt to
Did they actually say, This is the exact legal issue at stake, or are they
not allowed to poll against any questions they want, even if dreamed up? Can
they poll for instance on, Is Adam allowed to criticize our polls even
though he is not in threat of inferred squelching?
Maybe those of us who
ratio would be phenomenal.
The main problem to solve as I see it would be for legitimate recipients to
be able to determine when a message is real and not trash, without letting
an adversary know.
Erle
Subscribe to The Gann Letter if you are interested in:
varying levels of humor/jokes/quotes
12 matches
Mail list logo
