At 05:06 PM 10/6/04 +0100, Dave Howe wrote:
>Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>> There is a bill in this year's Ca election to require DNA sampling of
>> anyone arrested. Not convicted of a felony, but arrested.
[as in arrested for protesting]
>Doesn't surprise me - the UK police collected a huge bun
Major Variola (ret) wrote:
There is a bill in this year's Ca election to require DNA sampling of
anyone arrested. Not convicted of a felony, but arrested.
Doesn't surprise me - the UK police collected a huge bunch of
fingerprints and dna samples "for elimination purposes" during one of
the child
At 10:49 AM 10/5/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>Now it looks as if much of the fingerprinting may not have been legal
in
>the first place. According to lawyers at the New York Civil Liberties
>Union, the city may have violated state law by routinely fingerprinting
>arrested protesters.
There is
