Steve Furlong wrote:
US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
wire loops or bars and are locked with ordinary (if rather heavy-duty)
padlocks.
Speaking of securing military vehicles... I understand that most US fighter
jets are not equipped with self-starters.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Neil Johnson wrote:
I made a sign for a friend who had recently purchased a Vette.
It said please ignore, this car is just a AMC Pacer with a REALLY GOOD paint
job.
You gotta be old enough to remember the pacer for that to make sense tho
:-) I hope it was big
At 09:02 AM 4/30/02 -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
Ken Brown wrote:
... An even
if cars were like little tanks why not open them with ordinary
physical keys, like real tanks?
US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
wire loops or bars and are locked with ordinary
Optimizzin Al-gorithym[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 09:02 AM 4/30/02 -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
Ken Brown wrote:
... An even
if cars were like little tanks why not open them with ordinary
physical keys, like real tanks?
US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They
Jan Dobrucki wrote:
I do have an idea thou. I'm thinking how to implement PGP into car
locks. And so far I got this: The driver has his PGP, and the door
has it's own.
Path of least resistance - *access* to the car is generally not the problem.
Instead weaker attacks such as breaking the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have been thinking about the window problem and the ignition too.
What I was thinking was a car of the not so far future. Where there
wont be any windows because the driver will see the outside throu a
camera and he wont need regular lights cause there'll be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Greetings.
I got carried away a bit. Sorry. I'm on this list from around 1998
and I never had so much trash in my mail before. There is far too
many ads, and what more, 5-6 viruses each day. So I blew my head off
bout the USA.
I'm a student of law, not computer
