On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
As a (fellow) trained physicst, do you actually believe that
quantum-encrypted signals are truly secure as a byproduct of basic
physical law, or do even YOU believe that QM is merely a useful
calculational tool,
No 'label' is ever the thing it labels. QM
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May,
Thanks. It's nice to run into
On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 11:33 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real
Or even piqued.
world.
Weirder
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs which would
have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my curiosity is peaked
concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May, I believe, is trained in
physicsist, but there's no way someone out of school for
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May,
Thanks. It's nice to run into physicists and as a physicist, you'll
