--- "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am struck the contrast between the seemingly
> strong demand for wifi security, compared to the almost complete
> absence of demand for email security.
>
> Why is it so?
Because people generally understand the concept that Wifi is open,
and tha
> James A. Donald[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
>
> Reading the Wifi report,
> http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
> Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
> it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
> security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
> intended to
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
> --
> Reading the Wifi report,
> http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
> Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
> it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
> security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
> intended to fi
At 05:46 AM 11/7/02 -0800, Sarad AV wrote:
>hi,
>
>Wi fi customers are more paranoid than comparingly
>ordinary web users who are not so concerened of their
>security.
That's just plain silly. Its like saying a cellphone user is more
paranoid than a landline user. It was entirely convenience,
wi
hi,
Wi fi customers are more paranoid than comparingly
ordinary web users who are not so concerened of their
security.
If we make a product,it should sell or the least a
large number of people should use it(personal
satisfaction),so it sells better with 'Wi Fi '
customers.
Regards Sarath.
--- "J
--
Reading the Wifi report,
http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
intended to fix it.
I am struck the contrast between the seemingly str
