Re: legally required forgetting

2004-04-15 Thread John Kelsey
At 07:20 PM 4/10/04 -0400, An Metet wrote: .. BlackNet thwarts such limitations on the reporting of consumer credit. Clearly, providing access to this data harms individual privacy. Yet Cypherpunks traditionally have supported this concept. A privacy advocacy group promotes technology which would

Re: legally required forgetting

2004-04-11 Thread petard
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 10:33:39AM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > Thanks for the distinction, however it still makes CC folks slaves of > the > State. Suppose Joe Badcredit finds a blank application and applies? > The State then uses violence to coerce the CC into non-consensual > transaction

Re: legally required forgetting

2004-04-10 Thread An Metet
Regarding the question of whether debt must be merely 'forgiven' or actually 'forgotten', see http://www.epic.org/privacy/fcra for information on the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970: "The FCRA limits the length of time some information can appear in a consumer report. For instance, bankruptcies

RE: legally required forgetting

2004-04-10 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 11:18 AM 4/10/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote: >What the law actually states is (basically) a defaulted loan must be >forgiven after seven years. In other words, it is illegal to continue to >attempt to collect on a loan, 7 years after the default. > >However, it is perfectly legal to remember that