On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The biggest question there is why didn't they inspect it? Seems
very
bizarre, since that's what they did in the past.
That's what they _reported_ later that they did in the past...there
certainly was no public announcement
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:28:10PM -0800, Eric Murray wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:01:41PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The biggest question there is why didn't they inspect it? Seems very
bizarre, since that's what they did in the past.
All the KH-71s were busy mapping Iraq's
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:01:41PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
The biggest question there is why didn't they inspect it? Seems very
bizarre, since that's what they did in the past.
All the KH-71s were busy mapping Iraq's oil fields
and photographing Saddam's nose hairs.
Eric
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Yeah, but most pilots, if they suspected an even semi-serious breach of their
craft's integrity, *AND* had the ability to fairly safely send someone outside
to have a looksee, wouldn't hesitate a moment before doing so. They've been
delayed by
Has anyone run their psychosocial simulators on what happens when Osama
claims responsibility? Would he try this? What numbers do you get for
the US pop's reaction?
According to a friend from Ft.Meade, the Oyster (a massive parallel machine) is now at
point 96, which means that it can emulate
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:06:02PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
It's easier to just say Allah is on his side and this is proof :-)
Well? Even if they could *prove* total accident, the serendipity of the whole
shows the hand of Allah -- Eve of war, Israeli colonel who bombed the Iraqi nuke
