- BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE -
At 05:33 AM 9/13/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Bill Stewart wrote:
I find it more annoying that there are spammers putting PGP headers
in their messages, knowing that most people who use PGP assume PGP-signed
mail
is from somebody genuine and whitelist it.
Surely
At 1:33 PM +0100 9/13/04, Ben Laurie wrote:
Surely you should check that:
a) The signature works
b) Is someone in your list of good keys
before whitelisting?
Amen.
A (cryptographic) whitelist for my friends, all others pay cash. :-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto:
At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent
of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in context of
my RMX
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent
of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in context of
my RMX draft (SPF, CallerID and SenderID are
http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,1761,a=134748,00.asp
EWeek
Spam Spotlight on Reputation
Spam Spotlight on Reputation
September 6, 2004
By Dennis Callaghan
As enterprises continue to register Sender Protection Framework records,
hoping to thwart spam and phishing attacks, spammers
