would go to a fucking library to do
terror reading (maybe there is something positive here - I think that
we should get protected by pigs from extremely dumb terorists.)
The risk is not one terrorists have to fear. The biggest problem with
the librarian narc program is the same as most
On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
The risk is not one terrorists have to fear. The biggest problem with
the librarian narc program is the same as most of these anti-terrorism
measures: completely innocent people are harassed, arrested, or placed
under suspicion.
Tim wrote:
Even the owner of my ISP is narcing me out.
Read what he wrote recently to a Net.Nazi who wanted my speech limited:
I'm sorry that Tim is being a bother again. He has a long history of
being obnoxious and threatening. So far, he has not broken any laws. We
have talked to the
of apartment buildings and filed
reports on the comings and goings of their flock).
The purpose of this is purely a show and indoctrination.
1. No self-respecting terrorist would go to a fucking library to do
terror reading (maybe there is something positive here - I think that
we
On Saturday, August 30, 2003, at 03:44 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Saturday 30 August 2003 14:46, Tim May wrote:
Even the owner of my ISP is narcing me out.
Read what he wrote recently to a Net.Nazi who wanted my speech
limited:
(snip)
Huh. Did the ISP cc you on that, or did the would-be
that were once so common in the Soviet Union (the
babushkas who sat on each floor of apartment buildings and filed
reports on the comings and goings of their flock).
The purpose of this is purely a show and indoctrination.
1. No self-respecting terrorist would go to a fucking library to do terror
On Saturday 30 August 2003 14:46, Tim May wrote:
Even the owner of my ISP is narcing me out.
Read what he wrote recently to a Net.Nazi who wanted my speech
limited:
(snip)
Huh. Did the ISP cc you on that, or did the would-be censor forward it
to you as a warning that he held your access in
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 09:46 AM, Steve Schear wrote:
At 10:48 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, Kathleen Dolan wrote:
In many states, it is illegal to store records showing who borrowed a
book from a public library. Maryland, for example, requires
destruction of
the record after a point and even
Steve Schear wrote:
Looks like at least one library is trying a variation the method I
suggested...
The Patriot Act also prohibits libraries and others from notifying
patrons and others that an investigation is ongoing. At least one
library has tried a solution to beat the system by regularly
At 10:48 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, Kathleen Dolan wrote:
In many states, it is illegal to store records showing who borrowed a
book from a public library. Maryland, for example, requires destruction of
the record after a point and even backups cannot be accessed without a
court order.
KAD
Say a public
Ah yes, you're absolutely correct. Larger libraries, especially university
libraries, have been online forever. I was thinking of the smaller public
libraries, most of which have been getting computerized more recently.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
Harmon
Eric Cordian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
It was my understanding that libraries destroy records of patrons'
activity as soon as the books are returned. Nonetheless, this is an
interesting Federal fishing expedition, with warrants issued by secret
courts, and criminal penalties for librarians
12 matches
Mail list logo
