More details are here:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028-994667.html
Thanks :)
The Texas law is problematic in certain often-used scenarios. Our
corporate policy for remote access is to use SSL tunnels wherever
practical. In Texas, a road warrior with an up-to-specs configured laptop
would commit
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:49:22PM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html
According to this source, there are state-level law proposals which could
More details are here:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028-994667.html
-Declan
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html
According to this source, there are state-level law proposals which could
make firewalls, anonymizers, FreeNet servers, steganography software, and
distributed proxies illegal, despite of being originally intended against
cable and sat
