Re: Bush admin cybersecurity report weighs anonymity

2002-09-17 Thread Peter Fairbrother
Declan McCullagh wrote: It says the executive branch should consult with privacy groups and attempt to preserve civil liberties, but concludes that in some cases, privacy could be limited. Allowing completely anonymous communications on a wide-scale basis, with no possibility of

Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM

2002-09-17 Thread AARG! Anonymous
Niels Ferguson wrote: At 16:04 16/09/02 -0700, AARG! Anonymous wrote: Nothing done purely in software will be as effective as what can be done when you have secure hardware as the foundation. I discuss this in more detail below. But I am not suggesting to do it purely in software. Read

Re: CDR: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM

2002-09-17 Thread Jim Choate
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, AARG! Anonymous wrote: Niels Ferguson wrote: At 16:04 16/09/02 -0700, AARG! Anonymous wrote: Nothing done purely in software will be as effective as what can be done when you have secure hardware as the foundation. I discuss this in more detail below. But I

but _is_ the pentium securely virtualizable? (Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM)

2002-09-17 Thread Adam Back
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 11:01:06PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: [...] in a correctly operating OS, MMUs+file permissions do more or less stop processes from seeing each others data if the OS functions correctly. The OS can stop user processes inspecting each others address space. Therefor a