On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:26:22AM -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Unfortunately, if you want to read Tim, you have to read his evil twin
Skippy, too.
Living in *his* killfile, on the other hand, and if he actually uses it,
can be useful. Try it, you'll like it.
So what you're saying is that
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
Tim,
I AM GETTING TIRED OF SEEING CYPHERPUNKS RESTRICTING WHAT INFORMATION
FLOWS AND TO WHERE IT FLOWS...
-END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:56:24PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Can somebody with a webspider crawl these documents, and put it up
on the web?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt
All or nearly all of them are duplicates of same documents
elsewhere in the directory tree; X/text/ and
On Dec 9, 2003, at 8:46 PM, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 19:57, Eric Murray wrote:
Ok, bye!
plonk
Eric (just to make it crystal clear, Tim's going in my _personal_
killfile)
Shit, mine too. I really don't get what's happened to Tim. He used
to be a
great resource.
This robots.txt issue was exaggerated by leftist crtitics of the
administration. (This is not a general defense of the White House,
just a statement of fact.) The Bush WH.gov server has a special Iraq
section where press releases, speeches, etc. are reposted in a
different HTML template. The WH
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 19:57, Eric Murray wrote:
Ok, bye!
plonk
Eric (just to make it crystal clear, Tim's going in my _personal_ killfile)
Shit, mine too. I really don't get what's happened to Tim. He used to be a
great resource. Now he's even forgotten how to troll well.
shrug
At 3:58 PM +0200 12/10/03, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
So what you're saying is that we need a remote-plonk mechanism to insert
oneself into another person's killfile (merely entertaining this thought
makes me a loathsome Bolshie, I'm sure).
Yup. On both counts. :-).
Seriously, in IM, like AIM, for
At 10:07 PM 12/9/2003 +0200, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
He was just trolling, being intentionally vague so that they'd assume
he was copying from one DVD to another. Which they did, and which they
raved about.
Tim? Trolling? No, they'd yank his Ontology license if he did that
(and yes, someone
In a message dated 12/9/2003 11:58:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Green = Red.
Bruce Sterling is, for all intents and purposes, a commie.
Veridian, my ass.
My thoughts exactly.
Regards, Matt-
At 3:59 PM -0500 12/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cybergreen: Bruce Sterling
Green = Red.
Bruce Sterling is, for all intents and purposes, a commie.
Veridian, my ass.
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation
Hello
I'm curious. You say the list got some 400+ members right now and that's only the lne
node too. Can you provide some statistics on the users? How many addresses are .gov?
Any valid TLA addresses in there?!
Can somebody with a webspider crawl these documents, and put it up
on the web?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt
-- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a
__
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org
At 4:57 PM -0800 12/9/03, Eric Murray wrote:
I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
When Tim the asshole posts, I'm disgusted. Unfortunately
these days the latter Tim isn't letting the former Tim
near the
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:20:20PM -0600, Declan McCullagh wrote:
We have anonymity in Web browsing (more or less, thanks to Lance
co). It's not NSA-proof, but it's probably subpoena-proof.
We have anonymity in email thanks to remailers (to the extent they're
still around).
We have
I really would expect that preventing *spiders* (some spiders, even) using
the *publicly accessible* robots.txt would be a pretty horribly ineffective
form of skullduggery... can think of 10 things to do that are easier, more
effective and less of a potential pr fiasco...
see
I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
When Tim the asshole posts, I'm disgusted. Unfortunately
these days the latter Tim isn't letting the former Tim
near the keyboard very often.
I dunno...sometimes his
CodeCon 3.0
February 20-22, 2004
San Francisco CA, USA
www.codecon.org
Call For Papers
CodeCon is the premier showcase of active hacker projects. It is an
excellent opportunity for developers to demonstrate their work and keep
abreast of what's going on in their community.
All presentations
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
SNIP
In austin powers, they make the spy sound sixties by
depicting him as expecting the victory of the Soviet Union, and
perhaps rather favoring that outcome. If they had him quote
Ayn Rand, he would not have sounded sixties.
When the mass
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote:
What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone
speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I
have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm
interested in what people think NOW about Orlin Grabbe, DMT,
e-gold etc.
At 10:37 AM 12/10/2003, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote:
What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone
speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I
have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm
interested in what people
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 23:44, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 3:59 PM -0500 12/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cybergreen: Bruce Sterling
Green = Red.
Bruce Sterling is, for all intents and purposes, a commie.
Veridian, my ass.
Veridian green is entryist, not commie. The watermelons would
--
On 10 Dec 2003 at 18:22, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
alt.anonymous.messages has a healthy amount of traffic.
Google Groups says they have a bit more than 200 messages in
it on December 9, for example. I assume nearly all of it is
from remailers posting to Usenet (or remailers sending mail
--
On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in
checking account holder identification, so if you use an
effective proxying means (e.g., an open Wi-Fi hotspot) to
create and access your accounts you are pretty safe. If you
Tyler Durden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-12-08:
Is it possible to determine that the photo 'originally' (ie, when it was
sent to me) contained stegoed information, but that it was intercepted in
transit and the real message overwritten with noise or whatever?
Hardly, given the simple
24 matches
Mail list logo
