On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
If this is the case, then this reveals what I would argue to be a dangerous
mindset: The government needs to protect the people from themselves...ie,
from the normal operation of democracy.
On Cyperhpunks I would suppose this does not seem suprising.
From: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sep 30, 2004 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ID Rules Exist, But Can't Be Seen
..
For instance, is it indeed possible that revealing this rule would pose an
additional security risk? If such a rule exists (and it does) then hijackers
obviously
John Kelsey wrote...
Maybe. I guess the thing that's confusing about any of these answers is
that the rules as they're applied must be propogated to thousands of
people. It's not like they could easily hide guidance like no more than
10 Arabs per flight or double-screen anyone with brown skin
At 05:06 PM 9/30/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
I post this not as a refernce per se, but to ask the question:
Exactly Why Does the Government Not Want to Reveal Their ID Rules?
For instance, is it indeed possible that revealing this rule would pose
an
additional security risk? If such a rule
Talking out his ass, Tyler Durden wrote:
That's a good point. And those screeners ain't exactly the cream of the
crop, if ya' know what I mean. A year ago they were making minimum wage, so
if someone wanted a copy of those guidelines, it'd be easy as hell to con it
out of one of em.
There was a brief mention of this technology at the Crypto conference.
I provided some pointers in a comment to an Ed Felten blog entry at
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000677.html#comments (scroll
down to the 3rd comment).
Dan Boneh et al presented a proposal for a group signature
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/10/01/federal_program_to_m.html
Federal program to monitor everyone on the road
Interesting article about the Fed's plans to develop an all-knowing
intelligent highway system.
Most people have probably never heard of the agency, called the
Intelligent
What's a quantum repeater in this context?
As for Hype Watch, I tend to agree, but I also believe that Gelfond (who I
spoke to last year) actually does have a 'viable' system. Commerically
viable is another thing entirely, however.
-TD
From: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
http://www.shmoocon.org/cfp.html
Washington, D.C.
Call for Papers [PDF]
http://www.shmoocon.org
The Shmoo Group is soliciting papers and presentations for the first
annual ShmooCon. ShmooCon 2005 will be a highly-technical and entertaining
East coast hacker convention focused on technology
--- begin forwarded text
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sec-lists: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CFP: Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET 2005)
From: George Danezis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Open NymIP-RG discussion list nymip-rg-interest.nymip.org
List-Post:
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/0,,SB109659214177033379,00.html
The Wall Street Journal
October 1, 2004
REVIEW OUTLOOK
Patriot Act Misinformation
October 1, 2004; Page A14
The American Civil Liberties Union has been spinning its victory in a
federal court in New York this week as a
http://www.local6.com/print/3776699/detail.html?use=print
local6.com
'Frustrated' U.S. Cybersecurity Chief Abruptly Resigns
POSTED: 11:32 AM EDT October 1, 2004
WASHINGTON -- The government's cybersecurity chief has abruptly resigned
after one year with the Department of Homeland Security,
12 matches
Mail list logo