-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PGP, GPG, and all its variants need to die before S/MIME will be
able to break into the Open Source community, thus removing the
last, but persistent, block to an instant increase in number of
potential users of secure
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Steve Furlong wrote:
No problem --- I was just waxing my bikini line.
(This disgusting mental image courtesy of the Janet Reno Full Frontal
Nudity Collection.)
(That disgusting mental image courtesy of me.)
That depends on the gender preference of the reader I think -
At 12:43 AM 05/22/2002 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 11:49 PM -0400 on 5/21/02, Luis Villa wrote, on FoRK:
Well, yes, but you seem to be implying some sinister motive that
not all of us are reading between the lines clearly enough to see
:) I mean, otherwise, this just seems like a fairly
Adam wrote:
Which is too bad. If NAI-PGP went away completely, then
compatability problems would be reduced. I also expect that
the German goverment group currently funding GPG would be
more willing to fund UI work for windows.
Tell me about it. PGP, GPG, and all its variants need to
Sorry for the intrusion.
Analysis of Neural Cryptography
Alexander Klimov, Anton Mityaguine, and Adi Shamir
Computer Science Department
The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel
{ask,mityagin,shamir}@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il
Abstract. In this paper we analyse the security of a new key exchange
protocol proposed in
Bill O'Hanlon wrote:
Sorry for the intrusion.
No problem --- I was just waxing my bikini line.
(This disgusting mental image courtesy of the Janet Reno Full Frontal
Nudity Collection.)
(That disgusting mental image courtesy of me.)
--
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere Have GNU, Will
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:24:00AM -0700, Lucky Green wrote:
| Adam wrote:
| Which is too bad. If NAI-PGP went away completely, then
| compatability problems would be reduced. I also expect that
| the German goverment group currently funding GPG would be
| more willing to fund UI work
At 10:34 AM -0400 5/23/02, Adam Shostack wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:24:00AM -0700, Lucky Green wrote:
| Adam wrote:
| Which is too bad. If NAI-PGP went away completely, then
| compatability problems would be reduced. I also expect that
| the German goverment group currently funding
Open-Source Fight Flares At Pentagon
Microsoft Lobbies Hard Against Free Software
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60050-2002May22.html
By Jonathan Krim
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 23, 2002; Page E01
Microsoft Corp. is aggressively lobbying the Pentagon to squelch
Adam Back[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:05:49PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
So what if we create the Cypherpunks Root CA, which (either) signs
what you submit to it via a web page, or publish the secret key?
[...]
We then get the Cypherpunks Root CA key
Self-signed and CA x.509 certificates cannot be used in Outlook
even when they are added to the Trusted Root CA's.
Apparently Outlook is able to distinguish between these and
CA-issued x.509 certificates.
--- Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't speak for mail-only clients, but it's
As mentioned by others, NAI currently seems bent on discouraging proliferation of
existing PGP desktop packages. Part of this seeming strategy includes a refusal to
sell any further licenses for commercial PGP 7.X.
Strangely, the June 2002 PC Magazine (at least where I live) includes a CDROM
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Adam Back wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:05:49PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
So what if we create the Cypherpunks Root CA, which (either) signs
what you submit to it via a web page, or publish the secret key?
This won't achieve the desired effect because it will
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Curt Smith wrote:
This is a fairly accurate description of the situation, but
neglects to emphasize that the reason [1-cypherpunk] bothers
convincing [2-coerced associate] to use encrypted e-mail is
because [1] understands its importance and is attempting to
15 matches
Mail list logo
