David wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Greg Newby wrote:
the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP
meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there?
I should be there, since I'm free and in the area.
In a similar vein, who's going to be at DEF CON?
I won't be at H2K2, but I
dmolnar wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Greg Newby wrote:
the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP
meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there?
I should be there, since I'm free and in the area.
In a similar vein, who's going to be at DEF CON?
Me :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
Mike wrote quoting Lucky:
trusted here means that the members of the TCPA trust
that the TPM
will make it near impossible for the owner of that motherboard to
access supervisor mode on the CPU without their knowledge,
they trust
that the TPM will enable them to determine remotely
Lucky Green writes regarding Ross Anderson's paper at:
http://www.ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/toulouse.pdf
I must confess that after reading the paper I am quite relieved to
finally have solid confirmation that at least one other person has
realized (outside the authors and proponents of
Anonymous writes:
Lucky Green writes regarding Ross Anderson's paper at:
Ross and Lucky should justify their claims to the community
in general and to the members of the TCPA in particular. If
you're going to make accusations, you are obliged to offer
evidence. Is the TCPA really, as
