On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Petro wrote:
| Permanently behind on my email:
|
| On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:22:41PM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
| I'm trying to remember details (author, title) of a short story that I
| read once. Its main feature, or the one that's standing out in
In cases where the statues might appear to reasonable people, otherwise
ignorant of the judicial process, to be made from whole cloth or contrary
to fairness or a plain reading of the constitution, denying juries
access can help thwart nullification. Its un-American and downright
anarchistic
At 02:29 PM 12/15/02 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Steve Schear wrote:
From the article:
The court dismissed suggestions the Internet was different from
other
broadcasters, who could decide how far their signal was to be
transmitted.
This is totally bogus thinking. The
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, John Kelsey wrote:
The thing that's being missed here is that, if elections can be won by
running on a pro-freedom slate, politicians will be found to do that. Note
Running and winning are 2 different things. So far most libertarians
don't win, but it's slowly changing.
On Sunday, December 15, 2002, at 09:22 AM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:18:52AM +, David Wagner wrote:
Declan McCullagh wrote:
Also epic.org (not a cypherpunk-friendly organization,
but it does try to limit law enforcement surveillance) [...]
Is the cypherpunks
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 08:56:04PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
I don't know, Ashcroft is adament about the 2nd amendment. It's about the
only good thing I can think of otherwise.
He's not as regulatory as his predecessor, but I find it hard to
reconcile that statement with the DOJ's actions in
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Realtime, cheap, reliable, invisible. Hard to fake, especially if combined
with other biometrics. Can be as sensitive as a canine, in principle.
[...]
http://www.eps.gov/spg/USA/USAMC/DAAD19/DAAD19-03-R-0004/SynopsisP.html
I would think anyone doing
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Steve Schear wrote:
From the article:
The court dismissed suggestions the Internet was different from other
broadcasters, who could decide how far their signal was to be
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 03:49 PM 12/14/02 -0800, Tim May wrote:
PLONK.
Hey, maybe Mike was talking about Mr. Booth, not Mr. Lincoln.
:-)
Tim has given me some motivation to work on an old idea. We'll see if I
get any time in the next year to make it happen.
At 12:53 PM 12/15/02 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
...
I think that a law which re-affirmed the rights to be anonymous, to
call yourself what you will, to be left alone, to not carry or show ID
would transform the debate about privacy into terms in which the issue
could be solved. (At least as it
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Steve Furlong wrote:
Jim Choate, in a display of bad judgement and ill temper never before
seen on the internet, spewed forth the following blood-libel:
I have fulfilled a lifelong goal, I have walked where no man has ever
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Steve Furlong wrote:
Jim Choate, in a display of bad judgement and ill temper never before
seen on the internet, spewed forth the following blood-libel:
I have fulfilled a lifelong goal, I have walked where no man has ever
walked before. I can now die happy ;)
I'm
hi,
--- James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
US policy was to restore the status quo ante in
Afghanistan,
put things back the way they were before the Soviet
invasion.
How does that make things better for 'afghan'
people,after all the bombing done on their home land?
The future
of
at Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:33 AM, the following Choatisms were
heard:
Nobody (but perhaps you by inference) is claiming it is identical,
however, it -is- a broadcast (just consider how a packet gets routed,
consider the TTL for example or how a ping works).
ping packets aren't routed any
At 11:00 AM 12/17/02 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
RAH
Seriously. cf recent neuroscience/paleoanthropology research about the
man-dog interface...
He's talking about a recent study (in _Science_) comparing the ability
of domestic
dogs, wolves, and chimps to interpret a human's signals -pointing,
While I disagree with the phrase revenge only becomes justice if
carried out by the State and I certainly don't agree with everything
ever written in a Crypto-Gram, I must disagree with your evaluation of
Mr. Schneier's editorial. Specifically, the phrase why the state can
NOT be just... Please
hi,
Mr. Scheiner was always a bozo,
If he is such a bozo,why are n't many of those saying
this not as sucessful as he is?
Mr. Sheiner's book on applied cryptography is a beauty
for a beginer.
--- Sleeping Vayu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Scheiner was always a bozo, for those who
If I recall some time ago (years ago) there was some discussion on
list of using non-US drivers licenses or out-of-state drivers licenses
I think to get around this problem. I thought it was Duncan Frissell
or Black Unicorn who offered some opinions on this.
(Actually I am interested in this
On 13 Dec 2002, Sleeping Vayu wrote:
Uh...I'd point out that this is no coincidence. The Conpiracy Theorist
would say that the War on Drugs was precisely the CIA's way to keep
its own drug prices high and continue funding their own little
activites.
Plausible.
Oh, and aside from the fatass
And this I guess was the cypherpunks post I was thinking about from
Duncan below.
The only worries then would be if the insurance company would consider
you insured in event of an accident with a non-US license. (Where
that could a Canadian insurance company, or a US insurance company if
you can
[I'm more convinced than ever that nullification figured into the
verdict. If so, bravo for the jury. steve]
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-978176.html
SAN JOSE, Calif.--A jury on Tuesday found a Russian software company not
guilty of criminal copyright charges for producing a program that can
21 matches
Mail list logo
