How long do you think it would be before the ISP described below would
receive a cease and desist letter, ordering it to remove the cameras,
in order to protect customer privacy?
My mind is churning...one would think there'd be a cute techno-fix to this...oh wait,
what about some form of brute
At 09:59 AM 12/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:10:18 -0500
Subject: Re: Using Brin to thwart ISP subpoenas
From: Charles Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How long do you think it would be before the ISP described below would
receive a cease and
Anonymous wrote:
Yeah--you got it--Poppies...and now that the Warlords are back in
charge the cash crop is back.
Remember that it was the US which encouraged the Taliban to crack down
on the cultivation of Afghanistan poppies. A gift of several million US
dollars convinced the
At 10:16 PM 12/22/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sunday, Dec 22, 2002, at 21:28 US/Eastern, Steve Schear wrote:
At 09:59 AM 12/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:10:18 -0500
Subject: Re: Using Brin to thwart ISP subpoenas
From: Charles Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R. A. Hettinga
The main question is - is 1984-type society stable ?
All this lamenting about hamstringed sheeple and fascist state does no good if it
cannot motivate some effective resistance.
My take is that via decimation of the middle class, successful subverting of the
education system and development of
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Sandy Harris wrote:
Methinks its more complex than that. I'm surprised to see reports of
opium coming out of
Afghanistan at all.
It's been almost 30 years since you were there, so things have
definitly changed!
I was there in 1974, before the 1979 Russian invasion.
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Neil Johnson wrote:
U, how about.
1. Big multi-national corporation buys off politicians to pass laws to protect
their business model (DMCA anyone ?)
2. Gets meter maid to enforce said law.
3. See above.
Ahhh, I see. Let's just get rid of the middle-man
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, David Howe wrote:
It isn't that wildly inaccurate - losing both control rooms would be
(and has been on at least one occasion) an absolute nightmare. on that
occasion, technicians had to get a five-year batch of radiation in ten
minutes by going in, operating *one* valve
James A. Donald[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On 20 Dec 2002 at 19:26, William Warren wrote:
voting keeps you free..voting is our way of controlling and
shaping the government.
No matter who you vote for, a politician always gets elected.
Those who do not exercise this duty do not deserve
A small three-paragraph story recently raised extreme concerns. This AP
newswire from Washington told how engineering models appeared to confirm
the nuclear industry's claim that a reactor containment vessel could
withstand a direct hit from a jet airplane. This may be a convenient
supposition
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Matthew X wrote:
The containment vessel may survive a jet impact but the control room and/or
temporary pools of spent fuel lying outside the containment vessel might
not survive. A nuclear core without monitored control because everything
outside the containment vessel is
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
The main question is - is 1984-type society stable ?
It's locally stable, but not globally stable. It eventually
has to collapse.
All this lamenting about hamstringed sheeple and fascist state does no
good if it cannot
Matthew X wrote:
If you lose control, the reactor scrams.
I don't recall a lot of scientific scoffing of the China Syndrome movie
when it came out.
When it first came out, it was considered a plausible scenario. Later,
DOE ran some accident simulations at an instrumented test reactor in
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Matthew X wrote:
I don't recall a lot of scientific scoffing of the China Syndrome movie
when it came out.
You obviously didn't read Nuclear News. It was taken as a major joke
because it didn't have one thing right in it.
When it first came
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
Non-voters are NOT viewed by those in power as protesting
against the system. They are viewed as:
a: People who are happy as fat with the way things are going.
and
b: People whose viewpoints can be totally ignored.
So Jim, I think you have it
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 08:06 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Yes. I strongly suspect that minds are quantum mechanical. My
arguement is at this point very hand waving, but it seems to me that if
minds are purely classical when it would not be difficult for us to
imagine,
i.e.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Matthew X wrote:
Strange but Rock The Casbah was a premonition of things to come at a
future date in time and space?
And it was filmed right here in Austin. The F4's are landing at Bergstom
back when it was a AFB. I'll leave the other locations as a test for the
class ;)
On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 02:27 PM, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 07:07 PM 12/21/02 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2002/1217/1
Moreover, prior approval from the Department of Health
and Human Services will be needed for experiments that might
18 matches
Mail list logo
