RE: [linux-elitists] LOCAL Stanford University: face down the DMCA enfo (fwd)

>Cops have a tough job. They deserve our thanks for doing a tough job. This one simple word - "our" - reveals your agenda. When did I give you permission to include me into your cabal ? So first you steal the affiliations, and then use them to promote your proteges. This is a basic propaganda

TSA's TIA Secret Spying on Air Passengers

Source: [Federal Register: January 15, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 10)] [Notices] [Page 2101-2103] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr15ja03-104] ---

Re: TSA's TIA Secret Spying on Air Passengers

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Steve Schear wrote: > >>Record Source Categories: > >> This system contains investigative material compiled for law > >>enforcement purposes whose sources need not be reported. > >> > >>Exemptions Claimed for the System: > >> This system is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)

RE: [linux-elitists] LOCAL Stanford University: face down the DMCA enfo (fwd)

Nobody said... "Cops probably deserve *your* thanks, since they maintain *your* cash flow." Are you sayin' this guy's growing some grade-A hydroponic sensimilla? -TD _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FRE

Re: CDR: Polygraphs and Phrenology.

The key ingredient in successful polygraph use is a trained, experienced operator; the machine really has very little to do with "detection." Unfortunately it is impossible to train a sufficient number of operators to the necessary level of proficiency for mass screening, so most polygraph users si

Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.

Hmm, I thought it was satire. On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:36:33PM -0600, Alif The Terrible wrote: > This is about the lamest thing I have read in years. > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote: > > > Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per > > se. We wa

Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.

Could be. If it is, that'll teach me (again...) to read the whole thread rather than try to just empty my [overflowing] mailbox... On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote: > Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:50:35 -0600 > From: Harmon Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alif The Terrible <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Stanford Talk - Solving High Technology Crime * 4:15PM, Wed Jan 22, 2003 in Gates B03

[Stanford's ee380 class often has interesting talks. This one sounds like it's by the Bad Guys :-) There's a parking building nearby where the public can park after 4:00, but construction has eaten most of the other parking lots.] Subject: [CSL Colloq] Solving High Technology Crime * 4:15PM, Wed J

Freak show of fags, dykes, and persyns of transgender at Starbuck's

On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 04:45 AM, Jay h wrote: -- Original Message -- From: Matthew X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:47:49 +1100 street, and through the windows of a Starbucks and a Victoria's Secret. Yes all those evil weapons

RE: [linux-elitists] LOCAL Stanford University: face down the DMCA enforcers (fwd)

Based on Larry Augustin's apology for cops and his avowed closeness to them, a protest is even more deserved against him if not the other participants. Larry appears to be quoting from the COPS PR manual for garnering public support to offset deserved criticism of official misbehavior. Larry is

Re: CDR: Re: Petro's catch-22 incorrect (Re: citizens can be named as enemy combatants)

"Kevin S. Van Horn" wrote: > > John Kelsey wrote: > > > No policy toward anyone isn't possible once there's any kind of > > contact. There are terrorists who'd want to do nasty things to us for > > simply allowing global trade, or for allowing trade with repressive > > regimes like Saudi Arabi

Re: CDR: Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.

This is about the lamest thing I have read in years. On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote: > Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per > se. We wanted to utilize some crappy generic corporate "art" to auto-destroy > another establishment that, at the time, w

Re: Petro's catch-22 incorrect (Re: citizens can be named as enemy combatants)

-- On 18 Jan 2003 at 10:01, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote: > The terrorists have made it pretty clear what their gripe > with the U.S. Government is, and it has nothing to do with > trade, the American lifestyle, or the elusive freedoms that > Americans supposedly enjoy. It has everything to do wit

Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.

Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per se. We wanted to utilize some crappy generic corporate "art" to auto-destroy another establishment that, at the time, was rapidly crystallizing "brand consciousness" in the minds of consumers. By destroying a Starbucks, w

RE: [linux-elitists] LOCAL Stanford University: face down the DMCA enforcers (fwd)

Hold your fire for a moment. Could be hitting the wrong ones. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:25:10 -0800 From: Larry M. Augustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Don Marti' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Karsten M. Self' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [lin

Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.

-- Original Message -- From: Matthew X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:47:49 +1100 >street, and through the windows of a Starbucks and a Victoria's Secret. Yes all those evil weapons of mass destruction made by Victoria's Secret... they MUS