Sunder wrote:
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but the
shuttle was on its way *down*. Why would they be bringing
Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Dave Howe wrote:
Sunder wrote:
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but
At 10:19 AM 02/02/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:
Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris
has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.
They're also saying that Feds will come and arrest you if you touch them.
You'll have to draw your own conclusions
--- Eric Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb
I'm not sure which is more irritating-- the obvious
way in which
the govermedia manipulate the issue, or their
automatic assumption that
americans are too stupid/criminal to turn in all the
parts they
find if NASA just said we need all
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:19:27AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say Look, folks, NASA
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are
no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces.
And they certainly
Watching some of the news coverage of the search (from the aptly named
Palestine, Texas), it's clear that no search warrants are being gotten
for the debris searchers to enter farms, yards, backyards, corporation
lands, ranches, etc. The cameras show them simply vaulting fences and
looking for
At 8:27 PM -0800 2/2/03, Steve Schear wrote:
As some friends in the U.S. space program had privately predicted, and the
New York Times is today reporting, unless the problem with the Shuttle can
be quickly identified and convincingly rectified to worried legislators,
the International Space
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:27:06PM -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
I can't imagine that it would be so difficult to construct a small,
remotely-controlled, gyro stabilized, tethered probe that would be carried
on all shuttle missions and could be deployed from the cargo bay to closely
inspect
Think upgrading of circuit boards. Remove old board, insert new board for
example. Leaving the old board circling around may not be a good
thing. Just for example.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like
At 10:19 AM 2/2/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
...
Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.
Well, the bit about 18 times the speed of light, and
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
The look on your fellow astronauts'
faces right before the grenade you are
holding explodes --PRICELESS
Please. If we're going to toss around conspiracy theories, let's make sure
they are sane. I am having a hard time imagining a
Yeah, I got the same thing. When I went to do a group reply, it had no CC:,
just Steve. I've been noticing the same thing with Declan's messages. Weird.
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:15:19PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 09:36 PM, Ralph Seberry wrote:
On Sunday, 02
At 12:26 PM -0800 2/2/03, Eric Cordian quoted:
In another teletext moment on CNN, the shuttle was described as traveling
at Mock 18.
We mach (sic) their idiocy.
Cheers - Bill
-
Bill Frantz | Due process for all
Bill Frantz wrote:
At 10:19 AM -0800 2/2/03, Tim May wrote:
Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an information slug at
the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: Columbia was traveling 18
times faster than the speed of light.
Please mister spaceman, won't you please take me along for
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate
Release
February 3, 2003
Project BioShield
TODAYS PRESIDENTIAL ACTION
X In his State of the Union Address, President Bush announced
Project BioShield -- a comprehensive effort to develop and make available
modern, effective
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:07 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say Look, folks, NASA
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There
are no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these
pieces. And they certainly
http://news.google.com/news?hl=enq=carter
http://news.google.com/news?q=cluster:www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraque/0,6119,2-10-1460_1314911,00.html
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraque/0,6119,2-10-1460_1314911,00.html
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/news.asp?ArticleID=75983
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 12:48 AM, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
The only theory that I find remotely worth pursuing is that the shuttle
was bringing something back to earth that didn't want to come down. Tim
seems to have thoughts about this -- how easily could a satellite be
designed with a
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
some component which made them slightly ill.
Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them
pretty
sick...
First, if they are eating shuttle
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:31:35AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
I'm exagerating for effect here of course...there's possibly not as much
conscious decision making, and supposedly this kind of list-making happens
for much quieter, insider stuff (not smart bomb footage). But clearly,
there's
Meyer Wolfsheim writes:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
The look on your fellow astronauts'
faces right before the grenade you are
holding explodes --PRICELESS
Please. If we're going to toss around conspiracy theories, let's make sure
they are sane. I am
At 10:19 AM 02/03/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Looking at this more, I think it's two separate problems. I don't get the
recipient list suppressed or whatever it is from Declan's posts, it just
appears that something is wrong with the header, and it's probably something
minder.net is doing
Bill Stewart wrote:
Tim commented about railroad stations being in the ugly parts of town.
That's driven by several things - decay of the inner cities,
as cars and commuter trains have let businesses move out to suburbs,
and also the difference between railroad stations that were
built for
Gold star. Velvet Underground is definitely ground zero for Punk to my ears,
but with this recent set of pre-Velvets minimalist releases (eg, Dream
Theater, with LaMount Young, John Cale--who helped start the band I was in,
and others), the stage was somewhat set.
Yeah, yeah, yeah; I loved
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:23:58AM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 10:19 AM 02/03/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Looking at this more, I think it's two separate problems. I don't get the
recipient list suppressed or whatever it is from Declan's posts, it just
appears that something is wrong
Thomas Shaddack wrote:
I just hope they won't mothball the ISS...
Not if the scheduled Chinese manned launch goes ahead.
Everybody in Europe and the US should
have their genetic fingerprints entered into an
international database to enable law
enforcement agencies to fight crime and
terrorism in an unstable world, according to
James Watson, the co-discoverer of the
DNA double helix.
In an exclusive interview
At 09:09 AM 2/3/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
Second, I would do the self-destruct with accelerometers: if several
accelerations are felt, detonate.
1. Modern munitions arm this way. If you are an artillery shell
and you've been told to arm, and then felt 10s of Gs along
one axis and a lot of
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
I don't know how it works in the US, but railroads are both comfortable
and pretty reliable in Europe.
A bit too expensive, especially in Germany. I also like being able to work
on the train -- given that here cities are
I was shocked to learn Saturday that NASA had not a mechanism to
adequately
inspect the exterior of the shuttles for damage before the return to
earth. The reasons given seem to imply that NASA's ability for EVAs was
very limited and did not generally include on most flight the possibility
Has anyone run their psychosocial simulators on what happens when Osama
claims responsibility? Would he try this? What numbers do you get for
the US pop's reaction?
According to a friend from Ft.Meade, the Oyster (a massive parallel machine) is now at
point 96, which means that it can emulate
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:06:02PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
It's easier to just say Allah is on his side and this is proof :-)
Well? Even if they could *prove* total accident, the serendipity of the whole
shows the hand of Allah -- Eve of war, Israeli colonel who bombed the Iraqi nuke
Tyler Durden wrote:
And then there's the PERSISTENT rumors of him actually taking an accidental
DEA bust in a Florida airport after landing a fresh new cargo. Supposedly
this was a bit of a snafu and they had to let him go on the hush-hush...(And
I keep hearing there's video of that bust.)
Huh, so you're subbed to minder.net? And there's never been any problem with
group replies to your posts. So that blows that theory.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:52:27AM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
So what do we get here
--
Harmon Seaver
35 matches
Mail list logo
