Just thought someone should take the trouble to rebut the anonymous
pro-treacherous-computing rantings...
I have heavily trimmed our anonymous ranters verbose writing style to
keep just the bits I'm responding to (inline...)
The EFF tries to distinguish between good and bad aspects of TC,
but
Ok, so I finally bothered to read said article. I assumed that they had
something interesting that made it look to the error correction code like
a scratch, etc... They don't. No such weakness exists in error correction
used on CD's.
Their protection is no more than putting bad error
Tell Intel simply: We don't want no Scumware Inside We won't buy NGSCB
crippleware.
Want to sell motherboards? Don't include this shit. Keep it simple.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :25Kliters anthrax, 38K liters botulinum toxin, 500 tons of
| I've not read the said article just yet, but from that direct quote as
| the copy degrades... I can already see the trouble with this scheme:
| their copy protection already fails them. They allow copies to be made
| and rely on the fact that the CDR or whatever media, will eventually
|
I just picked up an Athlon64 3200+, which runs at a 2 GHz clock speed.
Using the Red Hat for AMD64 beta and the version of OpenSSL that ships
with that beta, I get 922 1024-bit RSA signs per second. This is a tad
less RSA signatures per second than I have seen on an 800MHz Itanium
using highly
[Can remote soldiering and amplified Terminators be too far away? Steve]
Monkeys Control Robotic Arm With Brain Implants
By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 13, 2003; Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17434-2003Oct12?language=printer
Scientists in North
I caught the announcement this morning from Skype concerning their
P2P-based VOIP (free) product. Apparently this is the Kazaa
founder's new company. The communications are supposed to be
encrypted, etc., etc.
Here's the Slashdot article:
At 09:08 AM 10/11/03 -0400, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Interesting that the State Department goes after Robertson rather than
Mowbray. Could it have anything to do with the idea that few(er)
people know
who Mowbray is?
Perhaps Mr. Rosenthal or Mr. Chong might have an opinion on this...
Excerpted from politech. Consider the 1st Amend implications,
and how clicking on a banner ad (which automatically would
pay the source site) makes you a terrorist supporter. Got assets?
Subject: US State Department extends FTO list to include Internet sites
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:20:23
- Forwarded message from Seth David Schoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Seth David Schoen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:44:16 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] LOCAL Mountain View, California,
USA: events this week
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Don
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 13:46, Steve Schear wrote:
Monkeys Control Robotic Arm With Brain Implants
Which means that even armless retarded monkeys can post to c-punks.
Profr, call your office!
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Jerrold Leichter wrote:
different forms. It's been broken repeatedly. The one advantage they have
this time around is that CD readers - and, even more, DVD readers; there is
mention of applying the same trick to DVD's - is, compared to the floppy
readers of yesteryear,
This makes 3 companies I know of working on Quantum Cryptography for key
distribution. There must be a few more...
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreadingdoc_id=41735
-TD
_
Instant message during games with MSN
13 matches
Mail list logo
