On Friday 31 October 2003 10:55 pm, Tim May wrote:
.. (Standard Tim May Anyone who doesn't agree with me deserves to die a
horrible death rant) ...
--Tim May
I figured that was coming.
Chuckle.
--
Neil Johnson
http://www.njohnsn.com
PGP key available on request.
On Friday 31 October 2003 12:10 pm, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Is is possible to use blinding (or other protocols) so that all votes
are published, you can check that your vote is in there, and you
(or anyone) can run the maths and verify the vote? Without being
able to link people to votes
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 23:55, Tim May wrote:
Increasing voter turnout is, of course, a Bad Thing. For the reasons we
discuss so often.
Agreed. To the extent that I want a government at all, I support a
constitutional republic, not a democracy. Legions of bleary-eyed,
TV-addled, bigoted
Author James Bovard will appear on C-SPAN 's Booknotes with Brian Lamb this
Sunday, 11/02, from 8 pm to 9 pm (I believe it may re-air from 11 pm to
midnight). Bovard will be discussing his new book Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling
Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil. I've
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:06:10AM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
On 28 Oct 2003 at 13:49, Adam Back wrote:
So for that reason I think Chaum's scheme practically would
not be viable over EC. (Or you could do it but you'd be
better off performance, security and key/messag size doing
Chaum
First, much thanks to Howie Goodell for his reply.
(Note that printing stuff on transparencies was proposed
(by Shamir?) some time ago, perhaps for quorum-required info.)
At 09:17 PM 10/31/03 -0600, Neil Johnson wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 12:10 pm, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Is is
Looks like the USG is going to outdo its ITAR silliness of a few years ago
with something even more ridiculous: Grammar and spelling corrections now
require an export license. The following was forwarded to me by Clark
Thomborson:
-- Snip --
Dear colleagues,
If I'm reading
I thought this forum would be able to provide the good gentleman with more
accurate data that the typical that is to be found on the below mentioned
mailing list.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every living thing dies alone.
Donnie Darko
-- Forwarded
Hello --
David Chaum has a new system that is an optical one-time pad. It requires a
printer that prints squares on both sides of a transparent 2-layer ballot. To
the voter it looks like ordinary printing with a solid black border. Then s/he
separates the layers, hands one in for counting
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Tim May wrote:
Or should we just add 20 of the remaining 30 list subscribers here to
the list of 25 million in these united states who need to be sent up
the chimneys? Works for me.
Do we actually have 30 subscribers left?
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahhh, the joys of shopping for new toys. A new sling. A scope mount and
4x. Music to the ears (after mufflers are properly applied :-).
Here in the heart of Redneck Country, there are two stores with a decent
selection that are under an hours drive: Dunn's and Galyans (a chain).
Galyans is
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 07:17 PM, Neil Johnson wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 12:10 pm, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Is is possible to use blinding (or other protocols) so that all votes
are published, you can check that your vote is in there, and you
(or anyone) can run the maths and
At 01:47 AM 11/2/2003 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Of course there are limits in regards to freedom of speech. They are as
follows:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech,
or of the
At 04:05 PM 11/2/03 +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Still... it occurs to me that the State
department is setting itself up for a DOS attack -- what would happen
if 10%
of all US academics were to apply for one of these licenses?
It would facilitate the blacklisting and later roundup. And hmm, where
At 11:12 AM 11/2/03 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
At 01:47 AM 11/2/2003 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people
Hi cypherpunks,
First-time poster. I've lurked awhile. I'm working on a system for key
infrastructure, and I'd like to invite criticism, comments, help, etc.,
from anyone interested. You can find the paper and code here:
http://trevp.net#cryptoID
Here's a summary -
The system is based on a
Fair enough. But this is not Chaum's scheme, it is Wagners and it is
DH based (or ECDH based in your writeup).
You said earlier:
Simple Chaumian blinding works fine on EC.
and the above scheme is not Chaumian blinding. Chaum never invented
DH blinding, if you read Brands thesis even you'll
--
James A. Donald:
Simple Chaumian blinding works fine on EC.
On 31 Oct 2003 at 15:26, Adam Back wrote:
So Chaumian blinding with public exponent e, private exponent d, and
modulus n is this and blinding factor b chosen by the client:
blind:
b^e.m mod n-
sign:
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
