On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, petard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
It's astounding to me that that Apple failed to do basic QC on its
major new release.
The problem with the Firewire 800 drives using the Oxford 922 chips is
inexcusable. Did Apple never bother
Not scared, hungry. They're looking for more collars they can throw in
jail so they meet their quotas.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :25Kliters anthrax, 38K liters botulinum toxin, 500 tons of /|\
\|/ :sarin, mustard and VX gas, mobile
At 02:09 PM 11/10/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
My first question is, how easy is it for them to estimate the key size
of an
encrypted message?
Its not secret. But lets look at twiddling what the message header
encodes.
Suppose you relabel a 2Kbit key as a 1Kbit. Then what are the extra
bits
I think that's the source as well - when the most recent of the
TWINKLE and TWIRL papers came out, Lucky Green was talking about
whether it was still safe to use 1024-bit keys,
and $1B for 1 key/day is similar to Shamir Tromer's estimate of
(
