Steve Schear wrote:
No, but this may be of interest.
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/wo_hellweg111903.asp
Its closed source but claims to use AES.
*nods*
closed source, proprietory protocol, as opposed to SIP which is an RFC
standard (and interestingly, is supported natively by WinXP)
At 3:17 PM -0500 11/19/03, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Yes, from /.
New Cellphone Offers Big Shots Eavesdrop-Proof Call
Tue Nov 18,10:23 AM ET Add Technology - Reuters to My Yahoo!
By Lucas van Grinsven, European Technology Correspondent
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A German company launched a new mobile handset on
Tuesday targeted at business
On Nov 19, 2003, at 6:37 PM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:31:24PM -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Show off.
;-)
Yeah, I need to find a better way to strip those internal links
when forwarding.
-Declan
I assumed it was stego in long URLs, a staple of the Resistance.
(More
At 12:59 PM 11/19/03 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
If and when this is accomplished the source could then be used, if it
can't
already, for PC-PC secure communications.
They claim to be releasing code for PCs for free.
A practical replacement for
SpeakFreely may be at hand. The limitation of
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:33 pm, Dave Howe wrote:
Steve Schear wrote:
No, but this may be of interest.
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/wo_hellweg111903.asp
Its closed source but claims to use AES.
*nods*
closed source, proprietory protocol, as opposed to SIP which is an
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 19:49, Bill Stewart wrote:
Too bad it's past tomato season on the East Coast
Shit, we've (upstate NY, along the Mohawk River) already had our first
snow. Didn't stick, but the chill in the air is literal, not figurative.
If and when this is accomplished the source could then be used,
if it can't already, for PC-PC secure communications.
A practical replacement for SpeakFreely may be at hand.
The limitation of either direct phone or ISDN connection requirement
is a problem though.
While the phone hardware
For the better part of a decade, now, I've compared David Chaum to the
Wright Brothers...
Read the article, and try to keep from laughing -- or blushing in the shock
of recognition.
National monopolies only worked for dynamite.
The Chaum patents expire in less than a year.
Cheers,
RAH
-
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:07:05PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Dumb, dumb idea. Almost as bad as Palladium.
Worse than Palladium. With Palladium, you can opt out (using OSS or
whatever) and you lose the use of apps that require Palladium. This
plan has the same effect, but to opt out means
The US has restrictions on even commercial satellite photos of Israel.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1084796,00.html
might indicate why --the torture center is airbrushed out of other pix.
The price of empire is death.
Declan McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-11-19:
There will be no questions and answers.
To a non native speaker, this phrase seems to imply a scary
level of control over the media people.
There will be no questions. Dissenters will be shot on the spot.
12 matches
Mail list logo