At 2:21 PM +0100 3/6/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Facultative strong authentication doesn't nuke anonynimity.
Perfect pseudonymity is functional anonymity, in my book...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation
Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A way that works would involve passphrase-locked keyrings, and forgetful
MUAs (this mutt only caches the passphrase for a preset time).
A way that works *in theory* would involve The chances of any vendor
of mass-market software shipping an MUA where
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:26:47AM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A way that works would involve passphrase-locked keyrings, and forgetful
MUAs (this mutt only caches the passphrase for a preset time).
A way that works *in theory* would involve The
At 1:14 PM +0100 3/6/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Filtering for signed/vs. unsigned mail doesn't make sense, authenticating
and whitelisting known senders by digital signature makes very good sense.
Right. A whitelist for my friends.
Of course, this doesn't help with people you don't yet know.
All
R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we really do get cryptographic signatures on email in a way that works,
expect 80% of all spam to be blown away as a matter of course.
I think you mean:
If we really do get cryptographic signatures on email in a way that works,
expect 80% of all
At 8:56 AM -0800 3/7/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Sure you will, if the groceries are in front of you, and the purchase or
possession of some of them you don't want associated with anything.
In this case the reputation of the grocer and/or your ability to assay
the
groceries (in meatspace)
At 10:56 AM 3/6/04 -0500, Steve Furlong wrote:
No, pseudonymity lets others identify messages on, say c-punks, as
coming from a particular sender. Reputation can work here, even with no
meat-space identity attached. Anonymity means reputation can't work, so
each message has to be taken on its
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,62545,00.html
Wired News
Chameleon Card Changes Stripes
By Mark Baard?
Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,62545,00.html
02:00 AM Mar. 05, 2004 PT
Your next wallet may be 8 mm thick and contain the only card you'll ever need.
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 10:32, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 2:21 PM +0100 3/6/04, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Facultative strong authentication doesn't nuke anonynimity.
Perfect pseudonymity is functional anonymity, in my book...
No, pseudonymity lets others identify messages on, say c-punks, as
coming
