An Metet wrote:
What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous
message? With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog
posting are possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better,
holding a private conversation is difficult or impossible. Best bet
seems
What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous message?
With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog posting are
possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better, holding a private
conversation is difficult or impossible. Best bet seems is to encrypt and
spam
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 14:12, An Metet wrote:
What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous message?
With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog posting are
possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better, holding a private
conversation is difficult or
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 14:12, An Metet wrote:
What technologies currently exist for receiving a/psuedononymous message?
With Mixmaster, sending mail, posting news, and even blog posting are
possible, However, receiving replies securely or, better, holding a private
conversation is difficult or
Hello Steve,
From: Steve Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 Apr 2004 12:14:30 -0400
Does anyone know of a reference implementation for Stefan Brands's
digital certificate scheme? Alternatively, does anyone have an
*Took* 'em long enough...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:30:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] Mobile flaws expose executives to bugging
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: InfoSec News isn.attrition.org
An Metet writes:
Eric Cordian quotes:
FBI Shill: Are we gonna exterminate the rat?
Hale: I'm going to fight within the law and, but, ... if you wish to,
ah, do anything, yourself, you can.
You're such a liar. I don't know why I even bother to respond to you.
You left off
