Was that our John Young on the Daily Show, talking about being
visited by FBI agents, with the title Anarchist under his name?
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/20/MNGQ28BM1O1.DTL
Washington -- Sen. Edward Ted Kennedy said Thursday that he was stopped
and questioned at airports on the East Coast five times in March because
his name appeared on the government's secret no-fly list.
SNIP
That a
Cryptography system goes underground (Aug 19)
http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/8/13
A group of scientists in Austria and Germany has installed an optical
fibre quantum cryptography system under the streets of Vienna and
used
it to perform the first quantum secure bank wire
On Aug 20 2004, Bill Stewart wrote:
| Yup. Reruns of the Daily Show are usually on at 7pm the following day,
| though check your local cable schedule.
Don't suppose anyone is willing to record and post for those of us who
don't have access to US channels right now?
At 11:50 PM 8/19/2004, Eric Cordian wrote:
Was that our John Young on the Daily Show, talking about being
visited by FBI agents, with the title Anarchist under his name?
Yup. Reruns of the Daily Show are usually on at 7pm the following day,
though check your local cable schedule.
The ban on Teddie flying had nothing to do with natsec. Years
ago it was tried due to his being drunk and his stench of piss, vomit
and scotch. Later, it was tried due to his being drunk, stinking, and
too fat to fit in a single seat, demanding two or more, depending
on whether he could be
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 09:54, Sunder wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/20/MNGQ28BM1O1.DTL
Washington -- Sen. Edward Ted Kennedy said Thursday that he was stopped
and questioned at airports on the East Coast five times in March because
his name appeared on
Oops.
that's what I get for responding too hastily - that response was supposed
to be to the mail indexed before this message ... though a little
non-sequitur now and then ...
Sorry.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 09:54, Sunder wrote: