Re: Perplexing proof

--- "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone explain how finding regularity in the > distribution of primes > > would affect any modexp() system? Suppose that you > have a function > F(i) which gives you the i-th prime. Since the PK > systems (eg RSA, DH) > use *randomn

Re: A nice little dose of pop conspiracy theory...

On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 10:34, Tyler Durden wrote: > Actually, despite some of the fairly dubious "what about this!" points, > there are some things that are a little unsettling. No way that's a Boeing > 757, and it's not like they can just lose one (ie, there should have been > one unaccounted fo

Re: BrinCity 2.0: Mayor outlines elaborate camera network for city

At 12:50 PM 9/11/04 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote: >So, since this is titled BrinCity, it surely means that the image >streams will be available from a web site and that we the people get >cameras in the emergency response center and the mayor's office? Is adultery a crime in Chicago? Given the predi

Re: Call for 'hackers' to try to access voting machines draws stern warning

t 06:59 PM 9/10/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > >Call for 'hackers' to try to access voting machines draws stern warning > The warning came after Elections officials received a faxed document last >week stating that a $10,000 cas

Re: Call for 'hackers' to try to access voting machines draws stern warning

At 7:56 AM -0700 9/11/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote: >The "No paper trail, no trust" coalition In St. Thomas, of course, it's "No paper trail, no trus' mon". ;-) Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Stre

A nice little dose of pop conspiracy theory...

Actually, despite some of the fairly dubious "what about this!" points, there are some things that are a little unsettling. No way that's a Boeing 757, and it's not like they can just lose one (ie, there should have been one unaccounted for). And I was unaware of the possibility that the FBI had

Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec

Bill Stewart wrote: At 12:57 PM 9/9/2004, Hal Finney wrote: > http://www.postel.org/anonsec To clarify, this is not really "anonymous" in the usual sense. Rather it is a proposal to an extension to IPsec to allow for unauthenticated connections. Presently IPsec relies on either pre-shared

Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec

At 12:57 PM 9/9/2004, Hal Finney wrote: > http://www.postel.org/anonsec To clarify, this is not really "anonymous" in the usual sense. Rather it is a proposal to an extension to IPsec to allow for unauthenticated connections. Presently IPsec relies on either pre-shared secrets or a trusted

Re: BrinCity 2.0: Mayor outlines elaborate camera network for city

-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- Message-type: plaintext R. A. Hettinga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2004-09-10: > Critics say the cameras ought not be regarded as a panacea in crime > fighting. They say the more there are, the greater the potential for abuse. So, since this is titled