Erwann ABALEA wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Seeing as it comes out of the TCG, this is almost certainly
the enabling hardware for Palladium/NGSCB. Its a part of
your computer which you may not have full control over.
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full control over your
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full control over your PC, even if this
Please stop relaying pro-DRM pabulum. The only reason for Nagscab is
restricting the user's rights to his own files.
Of course there are other reasons for
Hello Webmaster,
We have been looking for partners to exchange links with our site. I have taken
a look at your site and it seems like it would be a great resource that people
might be interested in visiting.
I propose that we exchange links. If you will link to our website, please use
the
The FBI continues to claim Jim Bell is a WMD threat
despite having no case against him except in the media,
but that conforms to current FBI/DHS policy of fictionalizing
homeland threats.
http://www.edgewood.army.mil/downloads/bwirp/mdc_appendix_b02.pdf
See page 16.
This document was initially
Some of that is actually pretty funny, like Mixed in with food served to
ex-girlfriend.
It really boils down to drumming up a stable gig for yourself.
-TD
From: John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Jim Bell WMD Threat
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:43:52 -0800
The FBI continues
Erwann ABALEA
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Seeing as it comes out of the TCG, this is almost certainly
the enabling hardware for Palladium/NGSCB. Its a part of
your computer which you may not have full control over.
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full control
over your
Uh, you *really* have no idea how much the black hat community is
looking forward to TCPA. For example, Office is going to have core
components running inside a protected environment totally immune to
antivirus. Since these components are going to be managing
cryptographic operations, the
Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That chip...is it likely to be an ASIC or is there already such a thing as
a security network processor? (ie, a cheaper network processor that only
handles security apps, etc...)
Or could it be an FPGA?
Neither. Currently they've typically been
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Seeing as it comes out of the TCG, this is almost certainly
the enabling hardware for Palladium/NGSCB. Its a part of
your computer which you may not have full control over.
Please stop relaying FUD. You have full
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
Uh, you *really* have no idea how much the black hat community is
looking forward to TCPA. For example, Office is going to have core
components running inside a protected environment totally immune to
antivirus.
How? TCPA is only a cryptographic
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Seeing as it comes out of the TCG, this is almost certainly
the enabling hardware for Palladium/NGSCB. Its a part of
your computer which you may not have full
11 matches
Mail list logo
