Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought

2005-05-06 Thread Sarad AV
--- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let us remember, of course, that the digits of pi are not random whatsoever: they are the digits of pi! Random is in the eye of the beholder. -TD Exactly. What an algorithm gives out is always deterministic. We try to see if there is some

Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought

2005-05-06 Thread John Kelsey
From: Sarad AV [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 5, 2005 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought Well, if it were generated by a random process, we'd expect to see every n-bit substring in there somewhere, sooner or later, since the sequence

Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought

2005-05-06 Thread Sarad AV
hi, --- Gil Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, is this sequence of bits random: 01100100010? How about this one: 00? From a true random number generator, both are completely possible and equally valid. Random as in the sense guessable and thus posing a problem to the

Re: [IP] Google's Web Accelerator is a big privacy risk (fwd from dave@farber.net)

2005-05-06 Thread Morlock Elloi
Google cookies last as long as possible -- until 2038. If you've And you are allowing cookies because ... ? And you are keeping cookies past the session because ... ? Too lazy not to? To lazy to login again? Inherent belief that commercial entity should make your life easy for purely

Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought

2005-05-06 Thread Tyler Durden
Yes, but only provided the universe lasts long enough for those digits to be computed! -TD From: John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sarad AV [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pi: Less Random Than We Thought Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:42:09 -0400 (GMT-04:00)