Amir Herzberg wrote:
Nicely put, but I think not quite fair. From friends in financial and
other companies in the states and otherwise, I hear that Trojans are
very common there as well. In fact, based on my biased judgement and
limited exposure, my impression is that security practice is much
Peter Gutmann wrote:
Neither. Currently they've typically been smart-card cores glued to the
MB and accessed via I2C/SMB.
and chips that typically have had eal4+ or eal5+ evaluations. hot topic
in 2000, 2001 ... at the intel developer's forums and rsa conferences
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
> I've read your objections. Maybe I wasn't clear. What's wrong in
installing a cryptographic device by default on PC motherboards?
I work for a PKI 'vendor', and for me, software private keys is a
nonsense. How will you convice "Mr Smith" (or Mme Michu) to buy an
expensive CC
Bill Stewart wrote:
Yup. It's the little keychain frob that gives you a string of numbers,
updated every 30 seconds or so, which stays roughly in sync with a server,
so you can use them as one-time passwords
instead of storing a password that's good for a long term.
So if the phisher cons you into
ence and engineering fields reaches new peak; 1st
time enrollment of foreign students drops
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/nsf04326/start.htm
--
Anne & Lynn Wheelerhttp://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
