James A. Donald writes:
Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably
Symbian.
Chris Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this
determined and achieved?
There is no official definition of genuinely secure
--
James A. Donald:
Since cryptography these days is routine and
uncontroversial, there is no longer any strong
reason for the cypherpunks list to continue to
exist.
John Kelsey
The ratio of political wanking to technical posts and
of talkers to thinkers to coders needs
to be addressed on lists that are not
explicitly political, leaving cypherpunks with little of
substance.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
AnKV4N6f9DgtOy+KkQ9QsiXcpQm+moX4U09FjLXP
4zfMeSzzCXNSr737bvqJ6ccbvDSu8fr66LbLEHedb
--
R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intel doing their current crypto/DRM stuff, [...] You
know they're going to do evil, but at least the
*other* malware goes away.
I am a reluctant convert to DRM. At least with DRM, we
face a smaller number of threats.
--digsig
James
no matter what you do.
Government regulators are a bigger problem, since they
are apt to forbid any business model they do not
understand, but they tend to be more predictable than
courts.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
, and
provides a secure channel to the user. So secrets
representing ID, and secrets representing value, can
only be manipulated by the software that is supposed to
be manipulating it.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
targets that have been
hammered through Tor.
In the long run, reliable pseudonymity will prove more
valuable than reliable anonymity.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
wE/La87xersBx39sShMCS6TkdqJr6DSYslVdXZkf
4GY6BRCS/b8OBic0E/U36X
of the kulaks was self defense against a
vicious attempt by the peasants to starve the
proletariat. :-)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
ikKvUYkvyBE7ikT3WsIGcsxLztiI6VjO7F+lbUPi
43u1MspIR5iABmysKM+9wkz7R+H7AgDDsuhTSZJ4A
--
James A. Donald
: So when I buy coffee, that is political?
Damian Gerow
Is it organic, fair-trade, shade-grown coffee?
Locally grown? Locally roasted? Purchased through
StarBucks or a local coffee shop? Do the growers use
their profits to help the growth of coca plants
.
These various isms are not marxism, not exactly, but
they bare a striking resemblance to their parent.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
JTnG7EwKWGBKCLMjy9fEelUGWOaNVelhzQKnyKWj
4KYcVP6IOe2k/gw1LLqwMfH5ioyRfGUAvNrJFj/2o
state area of our lives is the non
political area of our lives.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
OHqLH7EFCEVGI5CkHzpWzDH3Iyd7w5T1TSE3dyUB
4HvAcBSrD8JQfPtYDs3hHfuCbQWprTcJhov+r6b1+
is
advanced by more boring stuff: standards, software, and
business. Excessive mention of the ideological
implications of certain standards and software would be
counterproductive.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
voted
against this decision.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
OATUYUUD6X16QdQnFd2ZgGItmw0TrkkNoR5SYYAZ
4HZTgkPgkgTwPSGrDGUeYo6QjGZU5psCanKPMN479
--
James A. Donald:
While it doubtless would have been better to behead
the Saudi monarchy rather than the Iraqi
dictatorship, nonetheless American troops seem to be
finding an ample supply of Saudis in Iraq.
Major Variola (ret)
In what imaginary universe?
In the universe where
seem to be finding an ample
supply of Saudis in Iraq.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
UB064U/DafELO1g1L+J1elpcp4Rm0O4oDPOO5uH+
4rzwuJwOGk4RYWsWPOFN78tEmJamA31vLTloe7Rnv
obstacle is that 99% of
customers cannot understand WebMoney's security, or use
Pecunix's PGP based interface. If you try to sell them
Chaumian blinded transactions, the average mobster is
going to be seriously boggled.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0
an
unobtrusive and easily ignored warning if he has
never received a signed message from that source, a
considerably stronger warning if he has previously
received signed mail from that source.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
HsbCTO3R0hDvTi4O2HOi/0Y0UtIUZ/LWAkI3C0Wg
4aRr/HrQ9ZtcE0cqgSbp57xoZ1X3xpgldD4zNHi5M
and shaky dollars so abundantly
printed by the Bush administration, is that the chinese
banking system is even more dubious and shaky. Chinese
prefer to stash their wealth in America, rather than in
China.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
uploaders and storers,
and starving leachers, is pretty much central to the success of
a protocol and its software.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
MHH97gJAm7xaefDsVkckpP3M1T3kFYcHHE4T6q6e
4sy0PVrzWWflVPEeAHnZN9+Cf4YNPT7P4feuRNy00
that a strong password (not your ordinary password)
is secure.
Can anyone suggest a well reviewed, unpatented, protocol that
has the desired properties?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
A8bCmCXDTAX2Syg907T7uRpajs77l9CqLEii+ezP
that they
are in danger of being forgetten.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
Dn3N69hcbr+mL/HUTw8OhGtKmD9rHYOMN4NTBkIY
47AOCXrb7e35xm5QBsHbFVr/jfm+XwTUvzdiytKpG
--
James A. Donald
As governments were created to smash property rights,
they are always everywhere necessarily the enemy of those
with property, and the greatest enemy of those with the
most property.
Steve Thompson
Uh-huh. Perhaps you are using the term 'government
to a mere 2^109 or so.
So SHA256 should be OK.
2^69 is damn near unbreakable. 2^80 is really unbreakable.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
IQqit8pqSokARYxy1xVLrTaVRSKMAGvz2MXbQqXi
4DAQZgw0sbP3OcD3kgO+x7f+VfsPD4E8EBsB96d/D
property rights. You want to steal something like
land or women, you need a really big gang.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
of/pZSLkKATIjG0fWzPvEZnxIsBE/Q0Se80Gx178
4LGYWiIfc2+Us4l38hwPX8mK0CR7hBpVkJ952v8/D
.
There is nothing stopping you from writing your own operating
system, so Linus did.
If, however, you decline to pay taxes, men with guns will
attack you.
That is the difference between private power and government
power.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh
violence with impunity to
the one with the ability to convincingly tell the truth.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
6B7i0tiB4vUHqQnAP6nXT2z+B+zLB8624+K6+ENU
47fFHg6cY0KInzxMe/l+L2c7LqmPZyrwOSZepYIR3
--
James A. Donald:
Note that the main enemy it is aimed against is the CIA,
and it's existence was successfully kept secret from the
CIA for this time. (For had the CIA detected it, they
would have instantly leaked the information, the same way
they have leaked so much other
--
James A. Donald wrote:
Oh wow, let us expand our current highly popular and
successful Iraqi operation to embrace a quarter of the
world. Wouldn't it be nice? No, come to think of it, it
would not be nice.
J.A. Terranson
Since Mein Fuhrer Bush is preparing to escalate to Iran
Arabia, which are not
failing, but damn well should.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
KZbrHZ/MYP584OnYd7NsjZjmUpn8Srn0ydIoe269
4ATqczLXXya6Ei6jVdqfx7nHh1/Fdp6s6+VCLrdwO
--
James A. Donald:
Terrorists, as we discovered in Afghanistan, tend to piss
people off. They need a government that is strong enough to
intimidate the locals to refrain from killing them.
Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since when did a few remote Al Q boot camps piss people
arms are good guys
and which are bad guys after the regime falls.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
lYYew1mXLqlqClNWre3iWNTQSdUjC3dM+wojwWKP
4ZzkUnYtfu/tX/c5VsLePUrbbJ15Ww5uBlRvLj+Ut
The title of this post is misleading: The protest is anti
government, and pro property rights.
For example:
[...] People can see how corrupt the government is while they
barely have enough to eat, said Mr. Yu, reflecting on the
uprising that made him an instant proletarian hero
If he was
encryption/signing
technology.
Or in other words, due to the fact that PKI sucks, they have
left the door open for a replacement.
now the investment may finally be realized.
I don't think so.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
are
trivially protected, and the remaining third have done the
best they can under the circumstances
This may explain the lack of wardriving. Why bother to drive?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GZxQHl5Ys94JIEGFGqHzFIw0CwTw+cJrG2kcpVuC
--
James A. Donald:
The reason that taliban caught in Afghanistan, and people
with the wrong accent caught in Afghanistan, tend to wind
up in Guantanamo Bay is not because Afghan warlords are
taking orders from US overlords, it is because Afghan
warlords are fighting a holy war
is that it conceals your threat model.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
aV25L9tGoz00uU3bzcY+rbFDV5nX9BCkK67CRwcd
4mBXnVakFBPiPRCdugeDolUdtnd8iueWgYFwR3Pch
--
On 9 Dec 2004 at 19:47, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
In short, except for those few people who have some use for
MixMaster, MixMaster was stillborn.
As one of those few people who have had some use for Mixmaster,
it does not seem stillborn to me.
--digsig
James A. Donald
the street and steal some bandwidth just
because I find it a change to work in the open air.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
hOnTAnMFC4mbjwvyxYfLSmvpUXtw2xutPOvdyU0k
4Jx3r8szirxwjD/2L68Q0/BDk3jSlebytG9a9+2IQ
, at the same time he is busily subverting US enemies in
Iran. He has his own agenda, which on some matters agrees
with the US agenda, and others contradicts the US agenda.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
2c9x3EgsLT44LpYQQUlGud
--
Major Variola:
Internal resistance mediated by cypherpunkly tech can
always be defeated by cranking up the police state a
notch.
This is eg why e-cash systems have anonymity problems.
James A. Donald:
The problem is that any genuinely irrevocable payment
system gets
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
j/Q7ovPCBpocpAweY6EuWipd1SYuu09GuF0FDGs4
4F1phVigtAvUzPhC0QjPDP/3SKkY4KUtZc5hRUL9a
, for example the shelling of Kabul.
The relief that people expected to obtain by submitting to
Taliban rule was not relief from fighting each other, but
relief from indiscriminate Taliban attacks.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
--
James A Donald wrote...
And the problem with a civil war in Iraq is?
Tyler Durden
And the answer is: 9/11 sucked.
Oh wait, I guess I have to explain that. After the Soviets
were pushed out of Afghanistan the place became a veritable
breeding ground for all sorts of virulent
--
James A. Donald
And the problem with a civil war in Iraq is?
John Kelsey
At least three:
a. The pottery barn theory of foreign affairs--we'd be
blamed for making things worse.
And if we do nothing, we are also blamed for making things
worse: Observe, for example
1. the French
--
James A Donald wrote...
What made [Afghanistan] a breeding ground for terrorism was
not civil war, but diminuition of civil war. The problem
was that the Taliban was damn near victorious. If the US
government had maintained the relationship with our former
anti communist allies
--
James A. Donald:
And the problem with a civil war in Iraq is?
On 24 Nov 2004 at 2:42, Bill Stewart wrote:
Well, once you get past the invalid and dishonest parts of
Bush's 57 reasons We Need to Invade Iraq Right Now (WMDs,
Al-Qaeda, Tried to kill Bush's Daddy, etc.) you're pretty
--
James A. Donald:
Seems to me that permanent civil war in Iraq provides
Americans with the same benefits as democracy in Iraq,
though considerably more reliably.
Steve Thompson
You might be more accurate to say that a permanent [civil]
war in Iraq benefits miltiary leaders
has to be cleared with the top, the
fact that low level people are forbidden to think.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
56D0bYHQzFhVoqs5hSQzS0qvgik5OwJHVAMVGSfz
4FvsMZXY2Yed7To20MoGIPJ3rszxf79ZaE6XvYlpG
--
James A. Donald:
Qin had a cult of personality, in which every single person
subject to his control had to participate. A subject of
Qin, like a subject of Mao, was more aware of Qin, than he
was of his mother and father.
Tyler Durden:
You are apparently simply unaware
, but they're still
elitists...
Perhaps, but it is characteristic of american conservatives to
claim to be rednecks or hillbillies - and characteristic of
american leftists to condemn their opponents as trailer park
trash, rednecks, hillbillies, and sister fuckers.
--digsig
James
--
James A. Donald:
Pol Pot's Cambodia was, like Ch'in dynasty china,
decentralized in that they had twenty thousand separate
killing fields, but was, like Ch'in dynasty china, highly
centralized in that the man digging a ditch dug it along a
line drawn by a man far away who had
.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
w8wf5p0VKgycj9Ld3q9wBJikPRDq7/6mG2fem3Oi
481l46Enne+sD9gu1SutixMgpaZcYscUEn7FHAJPG
--
James Donald:
However Confucianism vs Daoism/Taoism is rather different
from what you would get in the west. Confucianism is
somewhat similar to what you would get if western cultural
conservatives allied themselves with nazi/commies, in the
way that the commies are prone
, with
mass compliance instead of mass initiative.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
A3r+IPhnwM5iwqn01H7AuV9g1K9PgqLsYSmZVb6P
4ewsr2ejzouasJCmgOSl3a3j3FucBkMACrPcAsosX
--
ken wrote:
And when was this stagnation?
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
Two words: Ming Navy
For those who need more words, the Qing Dynasty forbade
ownership or building of ocean going vessels, on pain of death
- the early equivalent of the iron curtain.
--digsig
James
the intent was not fear of foreigners, but as with
the iron curtain, fear of chinese wandering outside government
control and being contaminated with unauthorized foreign
thoughts.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
that was being dug.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
kIKFSkaq39tHojTf6+FAu2WFT3X6iHJMyTUNi7kx
4kLyg7PvSEfnbAOwjYFVGCmxNpP52VH6X9inrj6cM
--
James A. Donald.
China stagnated because no thought other than official
thought occurred.
On 12 Nov 2004 at 15:40, ken wrote:
And when was this stagnation?
Started soon after the Qing dynasty
And what were the reasons China did not stagnate for the
previous thousand years?
When
quite enlightened to the likes of Tyler Durden.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
k9Dumf7XMAhNCRDuxNd2aKQtrN2PqD2p2l3TDcjw
4SMVqw0LGnr3oZKU5v0WQpooJ4tKHdZvNiokzj2e9
written, of everything he
writes. If you complain that his lies in support of the Khmer Rouge
are old news, I will do a similar number on his more recent lies about
the Afghan famine.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
7d
ordinary people forbidden from doing banking
stuff, but a pile of loopholes in that law, and we do not have the
death penalty for unauthorized banking, whereas in China, they do have
the death penalty, and despite the death penalty, massive defiance of
the law.
--digsig
James A. Donald
.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
QwzmnNSSaHhQhQItWATHwnWB7cLchcXDK+wV1pDP
4p0FRureqYrveRbFxz5h7VDonlv9au7JlTFdp/2BL
for Kerry because you think he is a liar?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
EDbRclDc5acD10EGJi0ScHZfE2IslIbsawTQvj54
4jjneZ53XniQe2NYlNlFO5PGLTN5vTyDLI5okTjKv
them to
pieces on the spot.
Wrong
French nobles were taken prisoner in the usual fashion, but executed
because the English King commanded them executed.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
R2tc27UGwjykTsUjBSVNU/VakHCZzthZfJpceSzP
--
James Donald:
I routinely call people like you nazi-commies.
Eugen Leitl wrote:
How novel and interesting.
Cut the rhetoric, get on with the program. Cypherpunks write code.
I also write code, unlike people like you.
See for example www.echeque.com/Kong
--digsig
James
the armor improved (and became heavier and more expensive)
in response to the battle of Agincourt.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
wY4Gt1+GdEkqgNLQxKrMduPJSg/k6DEUpWEGeADc
48Orz+xAb/+RsojnqG7H/GLzb+Ll5QWvCCvF9MkuG
to
be acting to defend the poor and oppressed.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
QeJ5sNOExxqx0Vq7NTG0bDDnwEip8vKbsX9+9d8i
4IDiep3tuDmwKA77n4H3u9nHRV2g6oqOWQkRYfFcW
are the one's that have heroic fantasies of holding out
against hopeless odds, as for example Fallujah. The question is not
whether the terrorists keep Falljah, but merely whether Pentagon gets
a city or a pile of rubble.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0
--
Peter Gutmann wrote:
Fighting an unwinnable war always seems to produce the same type of
rhetoric,
It is a little premature to call this war unwinnable. The kill ratio
so far is comparable with Britain's zulu war.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh
this problem, Bush should
confiscate the Middle Eastern oil reserves.
You are using stale old communist rhetoric - but today's terrorists no
longer not even pretend to fight on behalf of the poor and oppressed.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
. An anarchic America would not be able to occupy
Iraq, nor would it be capable of building democracy in Afghanistan,
but it would be able to do the equivalent of sending special forces to
assist the Northern Alliance.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0
or honest soul searching.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
nVs3V7urdcH8GOjfhlNYzb0/JWqCDKupA3RE8WE3
4YdwLgC/LWPMsXcHeSFlqJW/NrcK/eDjuprNNcJok
.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
odq504QOMD1tmYFgnLderv0nS117FbcIG83t4MIX
4GzccezZIfj7BfeEbPLrXimv+SU42yCuvTxkLS+Rn
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
TCB2vWoGyhVihGigpgZNddyxcR+FX8/hDPZankmv
4jNqo70KLA5nfPvXptDt0z6bJGMJ0LDIX5iVsCD/p
--
James A. Donald:
Moral equivalence, the rationale of those who defend
tyranny and slavery.
Roy M. Silvernail
Moral superiority, the rationale of both sides of any given
violent conflict. The winner gets to use the victory to
proclaim the correctness of their interpretation
getting in
the way of this sort of deal.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
o32eoG4KhmccNjDBkOW9upEtn8Lka3zsooGJn8lY
4dMgCNOmt5z/S3km7vma/L6RECrRaVEmnhEZ4E2hb
.
and remember the fact that it was the US that propped up
Saddam as long as he stuck to the script.
Another tale from your odd parallel universe where the US
attacked Korea.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
zEWlCJhdBBReeJ2Tnl5midyyezqcb0uz
--
James A. Donald:
The remaining communists have made some psychological
recovery - see for example Tyler Durden's peculiar version
of recent history, where in his universe the communists
actually won and are still winning,
Tyler Durden
Again, you live in a world that's evenly
--
On 25 Oct 2004 at 21:03, Tyler Durden wrote:
The point is this: Almost and side in this world that has
committed or commits atrocities can find a true-believing
apolegist.
Moral equivalence, the rationale of those who defend tyranny
and slavery.
--digsig
James A. Donald
it, instead of
confidently asserting all this wild baloney, and deffending
past baloney with an endless stream of new baloney, pronounced
with equal confidence?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
xOlAusokL6372cJOfxYIKssrD7fRmaOORj2kjput
4y6M4TN
--
James A. Donald
For all that is wrong with the US government, remember the
condition of people under the great majority of the
world's governments: poverty and fear, where the political
privilege of a few shatters the economy and forces the vast
majority into poverty
--
James A. Donald:
Bin Laden's intent was to make anyone in America afraid -
thus the use of airliners, rather than truck bombs.
McViegh's intent was to make BATF afraid.
J.A. Terranson:
This is idiotic. You're claiming that the definition of
terrorist is dependent not on the act
governments, we would be as
poor, unfree, and frightened as the subjects of those
governments.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
FIkvqRtdx4mKda8MY0+7FCzRw09CvdTSH2IjDCV3
4H7vUDccMZaaLjHdsx+DkMirimYrUgLbOx8ZpmAjm
--
James A. Donald wrote:
You guys just keep making up facts.
There were no branches of the armed services in the towers.
You are just spouting bullshit, like the story that Osama
Bin Laden was trained by the CIA, that Saddam was installed
in a CIA coup, and all those similar
--
James A. Donald:
McViegh did not target innocents. Bin Laden did target
innocents.
Roy M. Silvernail
I'm confused. Is Mr. Donald saying McVeigh did not surveil
his target sufficiently to know that there was a day care
center in the damage pattern?
Bin Laden's intent
--
J.A. Terranson:
So if I was to go out tomorrow and spread 2000 curies of
Ci into the local subway system As payback for Ruby
Ridge, this would not be an act of terrorism?
James A. Donald:
That would be terrorism, because regardless of what you
*said* your intent was, you would
cleansing is a
legitimate response to an intransigent enemy with strong roots
in the local population - but the fact that the Taliban used
such measures shows they did not have strong roots in the local
population.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
--
John Kelsey
I'm still trying to understand the moral theory on which
you differentiate hitting the two towers from the
Oklaholma City bombing.
James A. Donald:
The pentagon did not have a branch office in the two
towers. BATF had an office in the Murrah building.
J.A
that
could have won free and fair elections had they been permitted?
Is it a given to you that Alger Hiss was framed?
Perhaps you need to check some of these givens.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
2xBHaKKtew47vYubi0WVdchRmiM1osWLaPLEM3IJ
--
James A. Donald:
The Taliban were illegitimate, not on legal grounds, but
because they were evil.
J.A. Terranson
Using this line of reasoning, Shrub is ripe for that
overdue case of high velocity lead poisoning.
Doubtless he is, but to suggest that he is comparably evil
innocents.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
Kiq2Py/gfRNvDbIgFETkSh12S9ilsTHs1STZ0G+i
4YtWt9FfhBsS+aa3NSU17iXdsABNEuxtdCDwkYKjY
--
James A. Donald
All of the terrorists came from countries that were
beneficiaries of an immense amount of US help. Saudi
Arabia was certainly not under attack. If they were
Palestinians, and they hit the Pentagon but not the two
towers, then they would be defending
the Chinese monetary system prior to 1949, so arguably that
money had to go somewhere.
liar.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
Ctgvg/767xVvEfZle9c/+vxKC3xtkjiX3R4NVIxk
4EMcaYvfC/Hefr1mG/wP4lnapr70KOuFu4ofYdQSC
--
Tyler Durden
The US was in Vietnam trying to fight their way up. So it
would have been pretty evident to anyone watching that
the US was trying to undermine the PRC.
James A. Donald:
You live in a world of delusion. Your dates are all wrong,
your events are all fiction
, and that we deserve
their past efforts to kill us, efforts that some of them
promptly resumed on release. We are under attack, and you are
telling us to suck it up.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
bsIXWc4h29VIJkgExpNjUGgUXb/7oelyrYSTY5hy
, and we're back to abayas,
beards and jihad.
You have this back to front. Khatami was marginalized by the
mullahs, and BECAUSE he was marginalized, because democracy in
Iran was suppressed, the US government THEN included Iran in
the axis of evil.
--digsig
James A. Donald
--
James A. Donald:
But Khatami was knackered shortly after being elected, so
any aid would be aiding the terrorists. We saw how well
that worked in Fallujah and Sadr city.
June 2001: Khatami re-elected
A few months or weeks thereafter, Khatami knackered.
Will Morton
--
James A. Donald wrote:
We are under attack, and you are telling us to suck it up.
J.A. Terranson
No. We are under attack by those DEFENDING THEMSELVES.
All of the terrorists came from countries that were
beneficiaries of an immense amount of US help. Saudi Arabia
was certainly
--
James A. Donald wrote:
How could the US have given him support, short of violent
means, such as bombing Tehran, which he was reluctant to
accept?
Will Morton
Money. Push it through your favourite UN department.
Schools and hospitals == goodwill.
But Khatami
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo