.
Surprisingly, I'm not the only one that feels this way.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of anonymity in
cyberspace.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would assume it can
save the changes back to them as well.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you could do from Houston libraries would be a proxy accessed via
HTTPS. At one time you could telnet, but that has long since passed.
Other public libraries? Who knows.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Not that
middleman is not useful, mind you (this applies to both Tor and
Mixmaster).
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Now,
the Harris County libraries might be different; I have not gone to one.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frozen for that long?
This is actually a release announcement for Tor 0.1.0.0-rc6 that was not
labeled as such, posted through the randseed Mixmaster remailer.
To the schmuck that posted the original: make it clearer next time, with
a clear subject line.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] NO TERRIER
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the truth.
In other words, NGSCB/Palladium/etc doesn't give you an advantage in the
least when you step onto a playing field tilting heavily in Microsoft's
direction.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
their chance to keep
my trust, and they blew it, big time.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 13:20 -0800, John Young wrote:
Here are photos of the Taser in manufacture, sale, training,
promo, and accidental misfire:
http://cryptome.org/taser-eyeball.htm
This came up 404 as of a few minutes ago.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usable
for the most basic of needs). However, regulation of the Internet such
that couriers would be the only feasible way to move large amounts of
data around (burned to CD or DVD as the case may be) is not a joking
matter in the least.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Note, I'm on the list, and I don't need two copies of every message in
this thread]
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 06:34 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
Agreed, if you want
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what it boils down
to archive this and send it back to
you when your wife gets pregnant and something similar happens to you.
And again, he likely didn't continue to fly because he wanted to. See #2
above.
--
Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 12:01 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
He may not have a choice.
Bullshit. 100% bullshit. Unless you are trying to cover a lot of
lake, flying is an option, not a requirement. Driving sucks - I do it
a lot, and hate every
: can you decline to vote on an office-by-office
basis, or is it all or nothing?
--
Shawn K. Quinn
On Tuesday 2004 April 13 17:26, sunder wrote:
Pete Capelli wrote:
Since when is there a guarantee of privacy in email??
Smartass reply Since PhilZ wrote PGP?/Smartass reply
But then, only if you use PGP (or GnuPG or what have you).
--
Shawn K. Quinn
over just about anything else.
Unless of course, there is hardware you need to use that isn't
supported under OpenBSD.
--
Shawn K. Quinn
.)
At least two of my prior e-mail addresses made never ever spam these
addresses lists (unlike remove lists, these are actually heeded by a
lot of spamming vermin), so I know that this can work.
- --
Shawn K. Quinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE
to
admit it is cute. :-)
How about either:
#pragma no_optimize
or
#pragma security
--
Shawn K. Quinn
a violation of laws like the ECPA (in the US) to do
so, but when there are potentially dozens of people who could have
divulged a message, how does one know who to prosecute?
--
Shawn K. Quinn
If one has set up a new anonymous remailer, where is the best place to
get the word out? Here or somewhere else?
--
Shawn K. Quinn
23 matches
Mail list logo
