On Jan 2, 2004, at 1:03 PM, someone wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 13:18, Tim May wrote:
Second of the items lne.com never sent to the list (that I have seen,
9-10 hours later).
I saw both articles, both the originals and the reposts, on the LNE
feed. I didn't, however, get the original of either
Okay... At a time like this, I might as well trot out the Tim May
Google-Stalk URL so everyone can get the full treatment...:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=imagesie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8as_uauthors=Tim%20Maylr=lang_ennum=100hl=en
(timcmayatgotdotnet doesn't work because it misses the earlier
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 02:19, James A. Donald wrote:
And to get back to the topic of this thread. I cannot see
anything but random deranged crap in alt.cypherpunks -- maybe I
need to adjust my filters, but there does not seem to be any
signal in the noise.
I don't see anything on
On Jan 2, 2004, at 2:00 PM, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Okay... At a time like this, I might as well trot out the Tim May
Google-Stalk URL so everyone can get the full treatment...:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=imagesie=UTF-8oe=UTF
-8as_uauthors=Tim%20Maylr=lang_ennum=100hl=en
--
On 2 Jan 2004 at 20:59, Tim May wrote:
Haskell running on 4 GHz of processor(s) gives you vastly
more power than any 10 programmers had several years ago.
It is not clear to me that Haskell is useful for producing
programs that are actually useful to end users. Sure you can
produce
