On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
> Obvious solution. Require all mandatory uglification of all
> foreign scenery -- for example video editing to insert some
> smokestacks.
Just pay them to decorate their unfairly lovely landscapes with
king-sized billboards.
*Poof!* Beauty gone, prob
At 5:59 PM -0800 12/12/03, James A. Donald wrote:
>Tim has been implying that I am a pinko, gold nut, and
>randroid, which sort of hints that Ayn Rand is too pink for
>him.
Apparently, he likes his meat burned -- and halfway up the flue...
;-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
T
--
On 11 Dec 2003 at 21:00, Neil Johnson wrote:
> Even Ayn Rand weaves this into "Atlas Shrugged" where the
> competitors of Reardon Steel get the government to try and
> force him to give them his formula for his high-strength
> steel because it's putting them out business and "unfair".
Ah
--
On 11 Dec 2003 at 23:39, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
> And now... tarrifs for filming movies in Canada. Just heard
> that one on NPR today, and I nearly drove off the road. The
> plan is to raise the cost of filming in Canada so that
> there's no longer an economic advantage. Made me want to
From: Neil Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What I object to are corporations who utilize their power (money) to influence
> governments to make laws that benefit them at the expense of others.
>
> - The DMCA
> - Tariffs AND Free Trade Agreements
> - H1-B visas
>
> Even Ayn Rand weaves this into "
On Thursday 11 December 2003 22:00, Neil Johnson wrote:
> What I object to are corporations who utilize their power (money) to
> influence governments to make laws that benefit them at the expense of
> others.
>
> - The DMCA
> - Tariffs AND Free Trade Agreements
> - H1-B visas
And now... tarrifs f
What I object to are corporations who utilize their power (money) to influence
governments to make laws that benefit them at the expense of others.
- The DMCA
- Tariffs AND Free Trade Agreements
- H1-B visas
Even Ayn Rand weaves this into "Atlas Shrugged" where the competitors of
Reardon Steel
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:18:37 +0200
Anatoly Vorobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was a rhetorical question. In the "old Soviet oligarchy", you
> would get into real trouble for publicly speaking against it. In
> "today's corporate oligarchy", this is obviously not true. Therefore
> the compar
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:41:21PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> > However, I don't see the strong support for Soviet or Maoist-style state
> > control these days...these are vaguely romantic notions once in a while, but
> > they don't have any deep ide
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
> However, I don't see the strong support for Soviet or Maoist-style state
> control these days...these are vaguely romantic notions once in a while, but
> they don't have any deep ideological support like they might have in the
> 60s.
I don't know about th
The anti-globalization protests are a good example of something
misunderstood by Libertarian old-farts. On some levels, these protests have
a libertarian character...anti-globalization is not really about eliminating
free trade per se, but eliminating "free trade", which is reall
11 matches
Mail list logo
