At 01:35 PM 12/20/2002 -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The moral equivalent of the pre-telegraph French semaphore soldiers
doing the macarena...
:-)
To the tune of I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.
:-)
Hey, you're hearing that more and more often in
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem to solve as I see it would be for legitimate recipients to
be able to determine when a message is real and not trash, without letting
an adversary know.
Access such page via http. Sometimes it's a streamed webcam, sometimes
it's
and nobody has the resources to attack all of your
mail.
So, I was thinking that rather than just encrypt each message, why not just
keep a constant encrypted stream open? So, even when you are asleep,
computers at each node are bombarding each other with encrypted junk
files. Your noise to signal
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Anonymous wrote:
And I wonder...with international companies now cracking down on
Power-Users of networks like Gnutella, one would think that
building-in some crypto capabilities (say into Kazaa) could be
something regular people might be willing to pay for. (Or, at the
At 03:01 PM 12/20/02 -0600, Anonymous wrote:
Or, alternatively, if Crypto use by everyday folks was as common as,
saying, Gnutella file sharing, then it would be a HELL of a lot harder
for invisible ears to pick out potentially interesting encrypted files
(how many Gnutella files are shared each
message is important. Encrypting everything gives equal
| suspicion to each message and nobody has the resources to attack all of your
| mail.
|
| So, I was thinking that rather than just encrypt each message, why not just
| keep a constant encrypted stream open? So, even when you are asleep
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Very good, sir. Your next assignment is to read about Mixmaster
anonymous remailer networks. Generally sending uniformly-sized (padded
or fragmented or noise) blocks at regular intervals is preferable (and
equivalent)
to your suggestion of
It has been mentioned that you should always use crypto. If you wait until you
actually have something private to send, then an adversary will know exactly which
message is important.
Or, alternatively, if Crypto use by everyday folks was as common as, saying,
Gnutella file sharing, then it
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The moral equivalent of the pre-telegraph French semaphore soldiers
doing the macarena...
:-)
To the tune of I'm a lumberjack and I'm ok.
:-)
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
