Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-28 Thread Tim May
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 06:42 AM, Ed Reed wrote: Grisham might be better - it's the legal wrangling that would tie up people's imagination, more than the technical. Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/25/2003 12:46:13 PM At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-27 Thread Ed Reed
Grisham might be better - it's the legal wrangling that would tie up people's imagination, more than the technical. Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/25/2003 12:46:13 PM At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: http://www.cryptonomicon.net/modules.php?name=Newsfile=printsid=463

Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-25 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: http://www.cryptonomicon.net/modules.php?name=Newsfile=printsid=463 Cryptonomicon.Net - Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System Someone needs to inject a story about e-voting fraud into the popular imagination. Is Tom Clancy available?

[cdr] Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-25 Thread Roy M. Silvernail
On Thursday 25 September 2003 12:46, Major Variola (ret) wrote: Someone needs to inject a story about e-voting fraud into the popular imagination. Is Tom Clancy available? Maybe an anonymous, detailed, plausible, (but secretly fictional) blog describing how someone did this in their podunk