On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:47:34PM -0700, Steve Schear wrote:
| http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/jk-02.09.03-005/
|
| German police have searched and seized the rooms (dorm?) of one of the JAP
| developers. They were on the look for data that was logged throughout the
| period when JAP had
This piece of political PR was sent to a mailing list intended for
internal reporting of computer problems at a university, so was
obviously automatically grabbed. Maybe someone sold them a list of
ac.uk addresses.
Dr Sean Gabb wrote:
2nd September 2003
Dear Educator,
We are writing to
Whoops - apologies for stupid posting here caused by /me/ being a
prat with my mail program.
Though the message body it isn't entirely off-topic here - the
subject line is quite unrelated to it. Mea culpa.
Ken
ken wrote:
This piece of political PR was sent to a mailing list intended for
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/jk-02.09.03-005/
German police have searched and seized the rooms (dorm?) of one of the JAP
developers. They were on the look for data that was logged throughout the
period when JAP had to log specific traffic. The JAP-people say that the
seizure was not
At 05:54 AM 8/22/03 +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
Still useful to protect against third party eavesdroppers, I guess.
Could it be at least somehow useful as a part of some bigger scheme, a
layer of a cake? Can a distributed multilayered proxy be
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
Still useful to protect against third party eavesdroppers, I guess.
Could it be at least somehow useful as a part of some bigger scheme, a
layer of a cake? Can a distributed multilayered proxy be built with some
less-than-trusted components?
Short
This is a terrible day for privacy advocates that used the once (perhaps
This is the great day for *true* privacy advocates worldwide.
In face of huge difficulties and dangers in providing real anonymity, some
human rights/wrongs organisations capitalised (in several ways) on the need for
RIP
The userbase of any anonymity service stays, and dissappears, with the trust.
- Original Message -
From: error [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:20 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] JAP back doored
This is a terrible day for privacy advocates that used the once (perhaps
never true) anonymous Java Anonymous Proxy. According to a story (
http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/32450.html) by The Register
(It was also posted to
(http://securityfocus.com/archive/1/334382/2003-08-18/2003-08-24/0)
CAMsg::printMsg(LOG_INFO,Loading Crime Detection Data\n);
CAMsg::printMsg(LOG_CRIT,Crime detected - ID: %u - Content:
\n%s\n,id,crimeBuff,payLen);
Well, people say the JAP team hid it, but with that (assuming the
strings appeared verbatim in the binary), they made sure someone
would spot
10 matches
Mail list logo
