Steve Furlong wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:50, Dave Howe wrote:
The regular encryption scheme (last I looked at a QKE product) was XOR
Well, if it's good enough for Microsoft, it's good enough for everyone.
I have it on good authority that Microsoft's designers and programmers
are second to
.
-TD
From: Dave Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:26:32 +0100
Tyler Durden wrote:
An interesting thing to think about is the fact that in dense metro areas,
you pretty much have a star from the CO
Tyler Durden wrote:
Oops. You're right. It's been a while. Both photons are not utilized,
but there's a Private channel and a public channel. As for MITM attacks,
however, it seems I was right more or less by accident, and the
collapsed ring configuration seen in many tightly packed metro areas
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:50, Dave Howe wrote:
The regular encryption scheme (last I looked at a QKE product) was XOR
Well, if it's good enough for Microsoft, it's good enough for everyone.
I have it on good authority that Microsoft's designers and programmers
are second to none. (Microsoft's
walking distance, sending high volumes of
extremely sensitive material between them)
-TD
From: Dave Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Email List: Cryptography [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Email List: Cypherpunks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Tue
From: Dave Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Email List: Cryptography [EMAIL PROTECTED],Email
List: Cypherpunks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:48:30 +0100
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Two factors have made this possible
Dave Howe wrote:
I think this is part of the
purpose behind the following paper:
http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/229.pdf
which I am currently trying to understand and failing miserably at *sigh*
Nope, finally strugged to the end to find a section pointing out that it
does *not* prevent mitm attacks.
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Two factors have made this possible: the
vast stretches of optical fiber (lit and dark) laid in metropolitan areas,
which very conveniently was laid from one of your customers to another
of your customers (not between telcos?) - or are they talking only
having to lay new
cryptography gets practical
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:59:40 -0700
At 05:12 PM 9/30/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
What's a quantum repeater in this context?
It's also known as a wiretap insertion point...
As for Hype Watch, I tend to agree, but I also believe that Gelfond
(who I spoke to last year) actually
At 05:12 PM 9/30/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
What's a quantum repeater in this context?
It's also known as a wiretap insertion point...
As for Hype Watch, I tend to agree, but I also believe that Gelfond
(who I spoke to last year) actually does have a 'viable' system.
Commerically viable is
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:39:24 -0400
http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,96111,00.html
- Computerworld
Quantum cryptography gets practical
Opinion by Bob Gelfond, MagiQ Technologies Inc
11 matches
Mail list logo
