I wasn't actually expecting anonymity. I wrote directly to
RAH, asking him politely to edit down his posts, and simply
post a few lines and a pointer. Not pointing out his
faults in public was simply good manners. His response boils
down to 'fuck you'.
Cypherpunks has a very loose charter, but it
At 10:14 AM -0500 12/22/04, Trei, Peter wrote:
>His response boils
>down to 'fuck you'.
"*You* may say that. *I* couldn't *possibly* comment."
-- Francis Urquhart, (the original FU), in Michael Dobbs 'House of Cards'
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Cor
At 11:47 PM +0100 12/21/04, Anonymous wrote:
>RAH, if you want to anonymize a quoted email, it helps if you remove the
>In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
Doh.
Not the first time that's happened, either.
*Gotta* remember that cut and paste thing...
Yours in header suppression,
RAH
--
---
Someone wrote:
>
> At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote:
RAH, if you want to anonymize a quoted email, it helps if you remove the
In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
> >What the hell does an article about gypsy
> >mechanics have to do with cypherpunks?
>
> I plead anarchic markets, m'lo
ions that NYC already has some very
anarchic elements.
I also found it useful from a very practical persepctive...I've got good
names to ask for in case I need some cheap (or discrete!) work done.
-TD
From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote:
>What the hell does an article about gypsy
>mechanics have to do with cypherpunks?
I plead anarchic markets, m'lord. Emerging phenomena, and all that, in
spite all regulation to the contrary.
Which was why I sent the traffic thing as well. No laws (or r
