to such scenarios. As for trailer trash,
however...
-TD
From: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius...
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:01:04 -0800
At 11:21 AM 12/9/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, May seemed to try to make the case
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Steve Thompson wrote:
snip one of the funniest posts in recent cpunk history
(STANDING OVATION) (SOUNDS OF MANY HANDS CLAPPING)
Thank you Steve, for that short but entertaining look into the dark
recesses of our collective consciousness :-)
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Steve Thompson wrote:
While we're speaking of pot, I should note that the grass available in
this neck of the woods is substandard at best. What with all the illegal
suburban grow-ops in Toronto, you'd think one would be able to buy
half-decent weed from time to time.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius...
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:19:06 -0500 (EST)
--- John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[May]
Maybe, maybe not. The thing I always find interesting and annoying
about Tim May's posts is that he's sometimes making really clearly
thought out
--- John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[May]
Maybe, maybe not. The thing I always find interesting and annoying
about Tim May's posts is that he's sometimes making really clearly
thought out, intelligent points, and other times spewing out nonsense so
crazy you can't believe it's coming
In my family there's a famous story told of a particular musician who was
busted on marijuana possession. His defense: But your honor...it was only
lemonade.
-TD
From: Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius
--- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Sounds like a fuckin' party, if you ask me! Quit bogartin' that J...
Oh, sure. It wasn't all bad. Just ask the chick who is known in certain
circles as Nefertiti. (That's her code-name). We had an excellent time
together; or at least we
--- J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Steve Thompson wrote:
snip one of the funniest posts in recent cpunk history
(STANDING OVATION) (SOUNDS OF MANY HANDS CLAPPING)
Thank you Steve, for that short but entertaining look into the dark
recesses of our
At 11:21 AM 12/9/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, May seemed to try to make the case that all of those useles
eaters
were in large part responsible for the very existence of the state, and
that
collapse of the state meant the inevitable downfall of huge numbers of
minorities (why he focused on
At 08:25 AM 12/8/2004, Steve Furlong wrote:
I know what you mean, but (a) I didn't write what I meant, and (b) I
don't think a true anarchy would be the proper environment for your
anarcho-capitalism.
My complaints about Tim's anarchistic writings were about his desire to
watch DC detonate, or to
If you think those are anarchist ideas, you've missed the
main ideas about anarchy and anarcho-capitalism and such.
Anarchism isn't about getting rid of the _current_ people in charge,
it's about getting rid of _having_ people be in charge.
Well, May seemed to try to make the case that all of
From: Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 7, 2004 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius...
..
Tim May has probably gotten all strange in the last few years, living in
his remote hilltop home, waiting to see the end that will not come since
the y2k crisis turned
At 9:17 AM -0500 12/8/04, John Kelsey wrote:
But once in awhile, even amidst the crazy rantings about useless eaters
and ovens, he'll toss out something that shows some deep, coherent thought
about some issue in a new and fascinating direction.
Yup.
Canonical Cypherpunk, and all that.
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:17:30AM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. The thing I always find interesting and annoying about Tim
May's posts is that he's sometimes making really clearly thought out,
intelligent points, and other times spewing out nonsense so crazy you can't
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:17:30AM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. The thing I always find interesting and annoying about Tim May's posts is that he's sometimes making really clearly thought out, intelligent points, and other times spewing out nonsense so crazy
it. Or at least, baked just enough to deflect most of those
not fully prepared to assail it.
-TD
From: John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius...
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:17:30 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 7, 2004 1:26
At 10:38 AM -0500 12/8/04, Steve Furlong wrote:
anarchist
Bzzt wrong answer.
Must filter that *in*, thankewverramuch...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 10:47, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:38 AM -0500 12/8/04, Steve Furlong wrote:
anarchist
Bzzt wrong answer.
Must filter that *in*, thankewverramuch...
I know what you mean, but (a) I didn't write what I meant, and (b) I
don't think a true anarchy would be the proper
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 09:26, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 9:17 AM -0500 12/8/04, John Kelsey wrote:
But once in awhile, even amidst the crazy rantings about useless eaters
and ovens, he'll toss out something that shows some deep, coherent thought
about some issue in a new and fascinating
--- R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 3:34 PM -0500 12/6/04, Steve Thompson wrote:
I rather suspect that
the people who 0wn the upstream pipe from my points of access are
toying
with their ability to interpose their data in place of
quasi-authoritative
texts.
Oh, *my*...
Come
--- Roy M. Silvernail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
Oh, *my*...
Where is Detweiller, now that we need him?
Huh? I thought that *was* Detweiller!
Detwellier had an oral fixation, and while I may like a good argument as
much as anyone, mere talk about sex never really did
At 8:59 PM -0500 12/6/04, Steve Furlong wrote:
Any way you look at it, the phrase tax money well spent would seem
to apply here.
I can't think of any way to use that phrase non-sarcastically.
I can't even parse the *sentence*...
:-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto:
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 17:00, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 3:34 PM -0500 12/6/04, Steve Thompson wrote:
I rather suspect that
the people who 0wn the upstream pipe from my points of access are toying
with their ability to interpose their data in place of quasi-authoritative
texts.
Oh, *my*...
Peter Trei:
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Try scruz.general.
or misc.survivalism
Steve Furlong:
Random racist ranting is also required. There are some racist
assholes currently posting on cpunks, but none have quite the May
flavor.
LOL
You can say that again. Here are a few examples of what this once
renowned cypherpunk usually writes nowadays.
First five quick quotes
--- Nomen Nescio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Furlong:
Random racist ranting is also required. There are some racist
assholes currently posting on cpunks, but none have quite the May
flavor.
LOL
You can say that again. Here are a few examples of what this once
renowned
--- Neil Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 08:46 -0500, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional paths,
to the abattoir
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Tuning
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Johnson
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:06 AM
To: R.W. (Bob) Erickson
Cc: Steve Furlong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Word Of the Subgenius...
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 08:46 -0500, R.W. (Bob
From: Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 4, 2004 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Word Of the Subgenius...
I thought JR Bob Dobbs got beamed up to that comet with those LA Koolaid
kooks...
No, but I do believe the comet kooks engaged in bobbitization (or perhaps,
merely bobbing).
Bonus question:
Who is the author of the origin question that inspired the copycats?
Well, I remember May posting it but I don't think he was the ultimate
author. I suspect whoever posted it recently in fact dug it out of the
archives and re-posted it, a particularly lame maneuver if so.
--- Steve Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonus question:
Who is the author of the origin question that inspired the copycats?
Well, I remember May posting it but I don't think he was the ultimate
author. I suspect whoever posted it
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 09:30, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 8:06 AM -0600 12/5/04, Neil Johnson wrote:
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Nah, this is mere Younglish wierdness.
You have to talk about useless eaters to be totally mayified...
Random racist ranting is also required. There
Random racist ranting is also required. There are some racist assholes
currently posting on cpunks, but none have quite the May flavor.
Yes, in comparison with May they are basically poseurs.
Oh, and in light of the Bob conversation, shouldn't we be describing 'RAH'
(a Bob) as 'RAHWEH'?
-TD
R.A. Hettinga wrote:
At 8:06 AM -0600 12/5/04, Neil Johnson wrote:
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Nah, this is mere Younglish wierdness.
You have to talk about useless eaters to be totally mayified...
Cheers,
RAH
John would warn you about the organ cuts
Tim would rave
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 08:46 -0500, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional paths,
to the abattoir
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Bobhood is never a light burden, as I'm sure RAH can attest
--bob
Tyler Durden wrote:
I thought JR Bob Dobbs got beamed up to that comet with those LA
Koolaid kooks...
-TD
From: R.W. (Bob) Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Word
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 18:42:01 -0500
word
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 20:42, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
Bobhood is never a light burden, as I'm sure RAH can attest
Bobbittization would make the burden lighter.
Neil Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 08:46 -0500, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional paths,
to the abattoir
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Probably busy in his hilltop bunker
Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 20:42, R.W. (Bob) Erickson wrote:
Bobhood is never a light burden, as I'm sure RAH can attest
Bobbittization would make the burden lighter.
To be bobbed is never the goal,
but bobless fear steers the undifferentiated bob
along conventional
At 8:06 AM -0600 12/5/04, Neil Johnson wrote:
Where is Tim May when when you need him? :-)
Nah, this is mere Younglish wierdness.
You have to talk about useless eaters to be totally mayified...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer
40 matches
Mail list logo
