On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Eric Murray wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:01:51AM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Can we assume that the spam is generated by regexp-type programs?
If so, are there good methods for inferring the regexp from examples,
and using this to infer spamfiltering
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:02:30PM -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 19:00, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Spammers recently adopted tactics of using randomly generated words,
eg. wryqf, in both the subject and the body of the message.
...
Could the pseudowords be easily
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 19:00, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Spammers recently adopted tactics of using randomly generated words,
eg. wryqf, in both the subject and the body of the message.
..
Could the pseudowords be easily detected by their characteristics,
..
Presence of pseudowords then
At 09:09 PM 9/4/03 -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
(it's one of
about 200 checks my program makes).
Can we assume that the spam is generated by regexp-type programs?
If so, are there good methods for inferring the regexp from examples,
and using this to infer spamfiltering rules?
Good project for a
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, John Kozubik wrote:
I must reiterate that, given the relentless efficiency of spam-spiders,
merely publishing a shadow email address on all web documents that your
real email address reside on, and deleting all email sent to both accounts
is my current favorite anti-spam
Hello,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Spammers recently adopted tactics of using randomly generated words, eg.
wryqf, in both the subject and the body of the message. These
pseudowords are random, which makes them different from real words that
are made of syllables.
Could the
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, John Kozubik wrote:
Try to write the logic that distinguishes this:
if_gre in the tree passes the mbuf to netisr_dispatch(), which in turn
calls if_handoff(), which does something similar.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
from this:
dyeiluykxoer dyeiluykcqkutknig dyeiluykkrpmhrku
Spammers recently adopted tactics of using randomly generated words, eg.
wryqf, in both the subject and the body of the message. These
pseudowords are random, which makes them different from real words that
are made of syllables.
Could the pseudowords be easily detected by their characteristics,
