Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> I just hope they won't mothball the ISS...
Not if the scheduled Chinese manned launch goes ahead.
> One of the current theories floating around has to do with a piece of debris
> that flew off the booster rocket during take-off and collided with the left
> wing (where the problems began). The video of the take-off was reviewed in
> great detail and it was determined that it was innocent, consi
t;doublethink" sign...if some theory is being
discussed that seems pretty important but then a few days later there's
absolutely no more mention of it, then that's a real good candidate for the
truth.
-TD
From: Thomas Shaddack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday, 2 de February de 2003 01:45, you wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Shaddack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Harmon Seaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 4:42 PM
>
>Interesting event, eh? Pretty well timed. They're already saying it wasn't a
> missle, which may be.
Or they want us to think so, playing double-bluff. (It isn't possible to
get a missile up there quickly enough and accurately enough to hit so high
and fast target. (Though one can never rule
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Shaddack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harmon Seaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: CDR: Re: Shuttle Diplomacy
[snip conspiracy theory]
> Especially
Interesting event, eh? Pretty well timed. They're already saying it wasn't a
missle, which may be. Could have been a bomb tho -- pretty weird that it's the
first problem they've ever had with a landing, and just happens to have the
Israeli onboard. Over Texas too. If it weren't terrs, then it mu
