Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-31 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote: Ever heard of caltrops? I hear it's a new growth cottage industry. Likewise the cheap EMP devices just talked about here. I've been thinking of There are no cheap EMP devices. You'll need a high voltage capacitor bank at the very least (I would not

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-31 Thread Tim May
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 02:50 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote: Ever heard of caltrops? I hear it's a new growth cottage industry. Likewise the cheap EMP devices just talked about here. I've been thinking of There are no cheap EMP devices. You'll need a

Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ed Norton wrote: I haven't seen anyone mention this here, and wonder if it's being reported out there West of the Hudson... Apparently, a large traffic-stopping protest here in NYC was performed using a method I hadn't heard of before. Basically, the

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:28 PM 03/30/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: According to indymedia, those SF protests last week seemed to be pretty effectively shutting down the financial district even without lockdowns, thru sheer force of numbers. Not surprising - traffic there only marginally works anyway, and if

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:14:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:01:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: Those who handcuff themselves to gates, to trees, inside PVC pipes, whatever ...should simply be left that

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Steve Furlong
On Sunday 30 March 2003 15:13, Tyler Durden wrote: Uh...I don't think Tim May gets the picture here. Think a few dozen PVC-groups consisting of 100 or more each, lying in the middle of, say, 5th avenue, or at the mouth of the midtown tunnel. Oh, and say it happens at 8:00AM on a Weekday.

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 01:25 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:14:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:01:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: Those who handcuff themselves to gates, to trees, inside

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:01:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: Those who handcuff themselves to gates, to trees, inside PVC pipes, whatever ...should simply be left that way. Their screams for water, for release, and then eventually

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Bill Stewart
At 11:35 AM 03/30/2003 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:01:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ed Norton wrote: I haven't seen anyone mention this here, and wonder if it's being reported out there West of the Hudson... It's been done here in

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:01:56AM -0800, Tim May wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ed Norton wrote: I haven't seen anyone mention this here, and wonder if it's being reported out there West of the Hudson... Apparently, a large traffic-stopping protest here in NYC was

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: Uh...I don't think Tim May gets the picture here. Think a few dozen PVC-groups consisting of 100 or more each, lying in the middle of, say, 5th avenue, or at the mouth of the midtown tunnel. Oh, and say it happens at 8:00AM on a

Re: Skeletons at the gates

2003-03-30 Thread Tyler Durden
(at least), and a city that is partially paralyzed for half a day. -TD From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Skeletons at the gates Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:01:56 -0800 On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Ed Norton wrote: I haven't seen anyone mention