R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>[Ob Cypherpunks: Seriously, folks. How clueful can someone be who
>clearly doesn't know how to use more than one remailer hop, as proven
>by the fact that he's always coming out of the *same* remailer all
>the time?
I hope I don't need to point out that always using the sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 9:15 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> I don't try to filter, but to join several sources. Anonymous is an
> idiot, but at least an intelligent one. I can't leave him out
> without creating a skewed picture of what is going on.
No offe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 4:12 AM + on 8/11/02, David Wagner wrote:
> I hope I don't need to point out that always using the same exit
> remailer does *not* prove that he is using just one hop. One can
> hold the exit remailer fixed while varying other hops in the pa
--
On 10 Aug 2002 at 16:25, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> [Ob Cypherpunks: Seriously, folks. How clueful can someone be
> who clearly doesn't know how to use more than one remailer hop,
> as proven by the fact that he's always coming out of the *same*
> remailer all the time?
The fact that he us
I don't try to filter, but to join several sources. Anonymous is an idiot,
but at least an intelligent one. I can't leave him out without creating a
skewed picture of what is going on.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> At 1:03 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Some anonymous, and now apparently
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 1:03 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Some anonymous, and now apparently
innumerate, idiot in my killfile got himself forwarded to Mr. Leitl's
cream of cypherpunks list:
> They will protect us from being able
> to extend trust across the network.
As Dan Gee
