etter steel find
application?" "Everywhere, bridges, buildings.." "Not at $50K per
pound, it won't!"
Why do I love NASA?
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html
and nary a "furry weavol" in sight!
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 20
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
some component which made them slightly ill.
Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them
pretty
sick...
First, if they are eating shuttle
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> > ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> > some component which made them slightly ill.
>
> Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
> sick...
Gee golly! I'm so glad that CNN told me that the
> ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> some component which made them slightly ill.
Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
sick...
Sigh, for the nth time already: While it's likely that bare boards,
replacement and replaced parts, manuals, access codes to tell the satelite
it's being worked on, etc... would burn up, pieces that were shielded
would survive. Think!
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
> Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
> been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
> repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
>
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and
at Monday, February 03, 2003 3:48 AM, Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
seen to say:
> Think upgrading of circuit boards. Remove old board, insert new
> board for example. Leaving the old board circling around may not be
> a good thing. Just for example.
Yeah, makes sense. ok, I withdraw my objecti
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:07 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There
are no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these
pieces. And they certainly did
At 10:19 AM 2/2/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
...
Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.
Well, the bit about "18 times the speed of light," an
Think upgrading of circuit boards. Remove old board, insert new board for
example. Leaving the old board circling around may not be a good
thing. Just for example.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 04:11 PM, Sunder wrote:
Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy
satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
Let's see, we're going into w
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:19:27AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA
> wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are
> no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces.
> And they certainly
--- Eric Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb
> I'm not sure which is more irritating-- the obvious
> way in which
> the govermedia manipulate the issue, or their
> automatic assumption that
> americans are too stupid/criminal to turn in all the
> parts they
> find if NASA just said "w
At 10:19 AM 02/02/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:
Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris
has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.
They're also saying that Feds will come and arrest you if you touch them.
You'll have to draw your own conclusions ab
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Dave Howe wrote:
Sunder wrote:
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but th
Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experime
Sunder wrote:
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
> shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
> gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but the
shuttle was on its way *down*. Why would they be bringin
crack at this? Please explain using your theories
how the shuttle can be traveling 18 times faster than light!
-TD
"Ain't I a stinker?"
BB
From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your
bo
At 10:19 AM -0800 2/2/03, Tim May wrote:
>Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at
>the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18
>times faster than the speed of light."
>
>Yes, "speed of light."
"Please mister spaceman, won't you please take me a
Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris
has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.
Part of the dumbing down of America, and of journalism. (I just heard
one Fox News anchorbimbo referring to the Russian rocket launched today
as "bringing suppli
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Tim May wrote:
Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at
the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18
times faster than the speed of light."
Yes, "speed of light."
This same slug has since appeared
21 matches
Mail list logo
