On Dec 16, 2003, at 1:50 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
This makes me a bit curious. Tell me, is your opinion then that the
U.S. has done nothing questionable here? You don't feel that treating
a former head of state (regardless of what you happen to think of that
person) in this manner and
--
On 16 Dec 2003 at 22:50, Nomen Nescio wrote:
This makes me a bit curious. Tell me, is your opinion then
that the U.S. has done nothing questionable here? You don't
feel that treating a former head of state (regardless of what
you happen to think of that person) in this manner and
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 18:18, Jim Dixon wrote:
I spent several years travelling in that part of the world.
Well, that just blew your credibility with this crowd. You're supposed
to spout off on topics about which you know nothing. Bonus points for
reflexive anti-state-ism [1] [2], and in
This makes me a bit curious. Tell me, is your opinion then that the U.S. has done
nothing questionable here? You don't feel that treating a former head of state
(regardless of what you happen to think of that person) in this manner and
videorecording it AND transmitting it to the entire globe
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Nomen Nescio wrote:
This makes me a bit curious. Tell me, is your opinion then that the
U.S. has done nothing questionable here?
No one seems to question certain facts:
* Saddam had hundreds of thousands of Iraqis tortured and killed
* he used chemical weapons casually,
At 03:18 PM 12/16/2003, Jim Dixon wrote:
You should try to remember how the
US Civil War ended. The armed forces
of the South surrendered. Lee handed his sword to Grant. I
believe that
Grant returned it - and allowed each Southern soldier to keep a rifle
and
a mule. Lee and the other leaders of
