At 03:34 PM 7/16/04 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a few months back offering an alternative to religion in
recruitment: the terminally ill.
That's not good for this purpose; their lifetime is too short.
Do you have evidence to support this (e.g., average survivial times of
the TI
Actually, frequent prosecutions could work to the advantage of a select
few who choose to become martyrs. Since it would make it much more
likely supplicants would be called upon.
Please explain this thought?
If people are intentionally trying to set up the jackbooted thugs to break
At 08:28 AM 7/13/04 -0500, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Bumazhkas? I thought I was pretty familiar with most weapons of the
world,
but not Bumazhkas. What calibre are they? I've always liked those CZ
Model 52
pistols and Model 32 subguns in .30Mauser. Loaded hot with a teflon
coated
bullet they should
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:03:14PM +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
That's a matter of course. At the moment the Men with Bumazhkas come, it's
too late to act.
Bumazhkas? I thought I was pretty familiar with most weapons of the world,
but not Bumazhkas. What calibre are they? I've always
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But we have a psychological mechanism here; many people tend to be
tough when not under direct threat. Then they implement the
mechanism. Then years flow by. Then the prosecutors come. But by then
it is too late to cooperate. They are doomed
At 05:22 PM 7/9/2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
Some months back I discussed a procedural methodology where patrons could find
out if their records hand been accessed in a way that circumvented court
orders. I was told that it might work but that
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2004, you wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
Quite a few book stores (including the local Half-Priced Books) now keep no
records not required and some do not even automate and encourage their
patron
to pay cash. In California book sellers to such used/remaindered
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Is it possible to write a database access protocol, that would in some
mathematically bulletproof way ensure that the fact a database record is
accessed is made known to at least n people? A way that would
At 01:44 PM 7/9/2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Is it possible to write a database access protocol, that would in some
mathematically bulletproof way ensure that the fact a database record is
accessed is made known to at least n people? A way that would ensure that
either nobody can see the data, or
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
This may best be accomplished by placing the data offshore and empowering the
db operators with some non-repudiatable right of disclosure (especially under
duress of a warrant).
This may be impractical in some cases.
Some months back I discussed a
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 Jul 2004 13:26:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: USA PATRIOT Act Survives Amendment Attempt
User-Agent: SlashdotNewsScooper/0.0.3
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/09/1145225
Posted
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
Quite a few book stores (including the local Half-Priced Books) now keep no
records not required and some do not even automate and encourage their patron
to pay cash. In California book sellers to such used/remaindered stores must
identify themselves
PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 Jul 2004 13:26:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: USA PATRIOT Act Survives Amendment Attempt
User-Agent: SlashdotNewsScooper/0.0.3
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/09/1145225
Posted by: michael, on 2004-07-09 12:49:00
Topic: us, 90
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Steve Schear wrote:
Quite a few book stores (including the local Half-Priced Books) now keep no
records not required and some do not even automate and encourage their patron
to pay cash. In California book sellers to such
14 matches
Mail list logo
