Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 10:23 AM 11/24/2002 -0600, Neil Johnson wrote: (Referring to previous thread about capturing video.) As I sit here looking at a 64 MB SD Card that I just picked up for $28 at my local Wally World, I was wondering why it (or it is larger capacity brethren) couldn't be used to record video and

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-25 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 10:12 PM 11/24/02 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: >On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote: > >> I believe Daniel Hillis (or was it Jaron Lanier?) inserted time-capsule >> information into a cockroach's DNA and released it into the Boston subways. >> He calculated that this would be the way to preserv

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Tyler Durden
This assumes the insert doesn't result in negative fitness (could very well be, if the insert kills a gene). If the information is the history of human civilization, that may very well end up being information of great "negative fitness"! (We shall see...) Actually, from what I understand, ther

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Morlock Elloi
> couldn't be used to record video and then (after appropriate protection) > swallowed. Eventually this will happen. Maybe a video recorded into a DNA of a bacteria synthesized in a portable device ("diamond age", anyone ?) Ne protocols will be required ("if I infect this east coast girl, how l

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Morlock Elloi
> Lousy latency. Just put your DNA-encoded message in a microdot on your > dead tree letter, and PCR/sequence on arrival. Isn't all snail mail already irradiated ? Then soon. = end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: Yahoo! Mail Plus  Powerful. Affordab

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Tyler Durden
rlock Elloi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Neil Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) ) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:03:39 -0800 (PST) > couldn't be used to record video and then (after appropriate protection) >

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote: > Ne protocols will be required ("if I infect this east coast girl, how long it > will take for the message to get to south africa ?") Lousy latency. Just put your DNA-encoded message in a microdot on your dead tree letter, and PCR/sequence on arrival.

Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Neil Johnson
(Referring to previous thread about capturing video.) As I sit here looking at a 64 MB SD Card that I just picked up for $28 at my local Wally World, I was wondering why it (or it is larger capacity brethren) couldn't be used to record video and then (after appropriate protection) swallowed.

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote: > Isn't all snail mail already irradiated ? Then soon. It's not, because electron accelerators are a) expensive b) tend to damage mail. Besides, the few ug or ng dry DNA in the microdot is not a living being. It can remain readable at ridiculously hig

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote: > I believe Daniel Hillis (or was it Jaron Lanier?) inserted time-capsule > information into a cockroach's DNA and released it into the Boston subways. > He calculated that this would be the way to preserve information for the > longest period of time.