There have been episodes of spoofing on this list. If client
side encryption just worked, and if what is considerably more
difficult, checking the signatures just worked, there would
be no bother, hence it would be rational to sign
Not just work but opt out is what you are looking for. If
Ben Laurie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:07:50PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 04:45 PM 10/3/02 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
--
James A. Donald wrote:
If we had client side encryption that just works we would
be seeing a few more signed messages on this list,
Ben Laurie
On Saturday 05 October 2002 07:34, Ben Laurie wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:07:50PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
But Ben is not spoofed here!
He is now.
Cheers,
Ben.
I will confirm this as a (detectable) spoof :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
Ah, but how do we
